Talk:2014 Peshawar school massacre/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MrWooHoo (talk · contribs) 20:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

Looks like a great article. Will start the review soon. Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon!  20:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)

I do my review with a main review, then a prose+source review to accompany it. Here is a good example: Talk:Global financial system/GA1
 * Pre Review Notes

I'm already concerned with Talk:2014 Peshawar school attack as the person who stated this comment is completely right. An article must be stable to become a GA article. Brandon (MrWooHoo) • Talk to Brandon!  20:06, 20 December 2014 (UTC)


 * Good to have you as a reviewer. Thanks for quick response. UBS  talk  20:32, 20 December 2014 (UTC)
 * First the "Reaction" section was formatted in bullets; now it becomes a table. --George Ho (talk) 01:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * There were different categories in that section which needed to arrange in a format format. Table looks better than bullets. UBS  talk  04:15, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Non-reviewer commentary: If the reaction section keeps getting large why not create another article for reaction. For example Sandy Hook Elementary School shooting has a separate article for reactions. As there were many reactions from governments around the world editors decided to copy the list to another article and turn existing list to a prose. If not this article will keep getting bigger and bigger making it difficult to read. Reactions section is the largest section in this article.-- Chamith  (talk)  04:31, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Agree. I'm going to create it. --Saqib (talk) 14:22, 21 December 2014 (UTC)
 * As another Non-reviewer comment, surely it's much too early for this article to be considered sufficiently stable to meet the GA criteria? Nick-D (talk) 03:37, 22 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Non-reviewer comment I support Nick-D and MrWooHoo on the stability criteria. I can't see how this could be considered stable enough in the near future. Regards, Peacemaker67 (crack... thump) 10:37, 23 December 2014 (UTC)
 * Non-reviewer comment I agree. The article is still unstable till the investigation is complete et al. Hence, it is too early to try and push for a GA. I think maybe a few months would let it cool down before it can hit GA. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 20:54, 23 December 2014 (UTC)