Talk:2014 Taiwan food scandal

New Sections
I think the article should be expanded to include sections on "Consumer Reaction" and "Lawsuits". Lasersharp (talk) 07:28, 10 September 2014 (UTC)


 * I actually somehow agree. As more information is coming in, I think this article has to be fully re-written or rearrange. When I initially write it, I put background, effect & reactions. I'm not sure on the part of the reactions from ROC governments (ministries & agencies), whether to put that in that "Reactions" section, or to have it all written chronologically as the main story of this Wikipedia article? let's say the story goes like this:

- when the tainted oil was found - initial effects & reactions (customer panics, share price drops, many foods returned to shops etc) - gov initial reaction followed by public & businesses concrete reactions (stop importing from taiwan, order school & military to stop using food with tainted oils etc) - how it became widely spread already (outside taiwan) - punishments made by kaohsiung city gov to the chang guan co. company (fines etc) - mitigation plan so that this incident wont happen again the future & with any vows from the officials


 * Probably those points have to be all written in the main body of the paragraph, without writing them too much at the "Reactions" sections, because it won't look like it is sequential. Lasersharp, maybe you wanna do that improvements? ;) Chongkian (talk) 15:37, 10 September 2014 (UTC)

New Story Part
Man, this story keeps on going again and again. After the September case, now it is the October case already. Seems like there are still many more info to come. I think we should really rearrange and reorganize this article to accommodate all of those necessary and important information (some which are still ongoing). Chongkian (talk) 16:49, 16 October 2014 (UTC)
 * agreed. Lasersharp (talk) 23:13, 16 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2014 Taiwan food scandal. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140911002259/http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/local-companies-take/1354178.html to http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/singapore/local-companies-take/1354178.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 00:19, 21 June 2017 (UTC)