Talk:2014 Veterans Health Administration controversy/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Peaceray (talk · contribs) 01:57, 25 November 2014 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria This article qualifies as a Good Article.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose is "clear and concise", without copyvios, or spelling and grammar errors:
 * I think that this article does a great job in describing the scandal in layman's terms. Much of the government source material was generated by policy wonk's, & this article summarized those works well. To check for copyvios, I ran it through User:CorenSearchBot/manual. The result was that Veterans Health Administration scandal of 2014, as of 05:44, 27 November 2014 (UTC), did not appear to be a copyright violation.
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * It is well-cited & uses over seven dozen sources without over-citation. During the course of my review, I was bold in assuring improving the consistency of the citations by putting them in citation formats, adding parameters, & the like. There are no broken links at this time.
 * B. Citations to reliable sources:
 * Links to a variety of news & government (executive & legislative) sources & at least one NGO source.
 * C. No original research:
 * Everything is drawn from the sources.
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * There are five images from Commons. Three are in the Public Domain; the remaining two are CC BY-SA 3.0.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Well done!
 * There are five images from Commons. Three are in the Public Domain; the remaining two are CC BY-SA 3.0.
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Well done!
 * Well done!


 * Peaceray (talk) 07:46, 27 November 2014 (UTC)


 * Thank you very much, Peaceray! --Pine✉ 07:22, 28 November 2014 (UTC)