Talk:2014 raid on Idlib city

Untitled
pro-Rebels news agency also reported that Syrian army retook Tall Mastumeh few hours ago - a 2017 reader will be puzzled--78.0.8.44 (talk) 13:49, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Even SOHR dont claim 70 regime officers dead
What a lie is being spread over the Attack it was repulsed the same day it was reported and 02 British press agencies claims 70 regime officers dead, even al-Qaeda claims 12 captured, but nothing of 70 beheaded, cmon, SOHR cant lie in this. Whos behind the disinformation british Inteligence Agencies?? Cmon dont believe that.200.48.214.19 (talk) 22:29, 28 October 2014 (UTC)
 * I have started a discussion on the main map talk page. I agree, these seem to be editorial error. 2602:30A:C01B:89F0:50D2:46CF:1649:D16B (talk) 23:58, 28 October 2014 (UTC)

Also the article mentions that ISIS attacked Idlib (while it was Nusra), so the article should not be taken seriously — Preceding unsigned comment added by 94.215.136.128 (talk) 11:47, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

Daily mail have showed lack of credability with the article they posted yesterday. As its now the WP article look Ok but with the (alleged) caption after the source.200.48.214.19 (talk) 14:55, 29 October 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 2 one external links on 2014 Idlib city raid. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141030081014/http://www.syriahr.com:80/archives/33766 to http://www.syriahr.com/archives/33766
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20141029193328/http://www.syriahr.com:80/archives/33851 to http://www.syriahr.com/archives/33851

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:04, 26 February 2016 (UTC)