Talk:2015–16 Big Bash League season

Player rankings
Karyasuman - maybe you could explain why these are needed? They've been removed twice by two different editors. Please reach a consensus before they are re-added. Thanks.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 08:16, 14 January 2016 (UTC)
 * I guess they (Player Rankings) perfectly accomplish the task of showing the best performers in the league which is definitely not shown in the stats, particularly more so with the all-rounders. Moreover, they are official BBL ratings provided by Cricket Australia and this page should provide as much information which is viable related to the league. Surely, people shouldn't have a problem with this? These type of information should easily be accessible through Wikipedia. Karyasuman (talk) 10:42, 14 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Exclude. We already have most runs and wickets; the rankings are a lot vaguer, and the reader is left baffled as to how they were determined. StAnselm (talk) 02:32, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * Exclude Just because they are reported elsewhere does not mean they need reporting here. Per WP:IINFO # - "Excessive listings of statistics".  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 09:52, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 1. Maybe then you should remove match summaries as well, they are reported everywhere else, and maybe even top wicket takers and run makers. Too many stats! Karyasuman (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 2. Even ICC ranking should be a lot vague for you, why not remove them. And yes, let these articles remain a stub because of a conservative approach. Haha, official rankings are vague, original research maybe? As to how they are calculated, official rankings have a link to that. Readers are baffled? Another original research. Cool. Karyasuman (talk) 10:28, 15 January 2016 (UTC)
 * 3. Excessive listing of stats? Hardly more than 3 stats on the page. I've seen much more than them on tournament pages, what else would you expect? Going by what they mention, if opinion polls are good enough, I hardly find BBL rankings to be less important for this page. And in my view, I did "consider using tables to enhance the readability of data lists". That section was hardly 5 cms long but created such a fuss. I am really disappointed with such an attitude. Karyasuman (talk) 10:40, 15 January 2016 (UTC)


 * Exclude per Anselm amd Lugnuts. I don't see how it adds value and I'm sorry but, personally, I don't support the use of statistics unless they are necessary or at least adding definite value for the benefit of the readers. Jack | talk page 09:45, 21 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2015–16 Big Bash League season. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20130701021540/http://www.bigbash.com.au/match-centre/fixture to http://www.bigbash.com.au/match-centre/fixture

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 13:20, 21 June 2017 (UTC)