Talk:2015 6 Hours of Silverstone/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: HawkAussie (talk · contribs) 00:05, 16 October 2021 (UTC)


 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, spelling, and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):  d (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

I will be happy to take this review.
 * Almost three weeks since this review was initiated. What is the state of this nomination? MWright96 (talk) 17:08, 6 November 2021 (UTC)

Lead

 * Le Mans Prototype is a duplicated link in the third paragraph as there is already one in the first paragraph.
 * The second-placed car was Richard Lietz and Michael Christensen's Porsche Team Manthey 911 RSR - Noticed that compared to the rest of the lead, this has the drivers before the car and not the other way round.

Entry list

 * Their G-Drive Racing team, which won four races in 2014... - Why isn't G-Drive Racing team not linked here.
 * SMP Racing is a duplicate link with the one in the second paragraph. Also Porsche Team Manthey, Aston Martin Racing and Manthey Racing has duplicate links that was further up in that paragraph.

Preview

 * No issues here

Practice

 * ...before teammate Benoît Tréluyer's sister No. 7 entry ended as the... - Needs a little bit more clear cut there
 * ...off the slippery track and into Copse corner's gravel trap. - Is there meant to be a reference at the end of this sentence?

Qualifying

 * ...which his co-driver Hartley improved on in clear air, with a 1 minute,... - there needs to be a comma or something to split that.
 * in fifth were 3+1⁄2 seconds slower... - shouldn't be that something like 3.5 seconds or something like that.
 * ...gave Aston Martin first to third in class in the team's... - Probably something like they were top three in class instead of having it from first to third.

Race

 * Forty-one minutes in the first full course yellow... - That is missing either a comma or a couple of words to make this flow better. Maybe something like "Forty-one minutes in, the first full yellow..."
 * With that same sentence, maybe split that into two sentences instead of one long one.
 * Several drivers in the top categories... - It's not quite clear on what categories we are talking. I assume this is about LMP1 and LMP2 but it's not clear.
 * Racing resumed in the 46th minute with Webber... - Maybe change it to only have it as a time difference between when it was a yellow flag and when it restarted.
 * ...because it was on an... - Shouldn't this be "because they were on an..."
 * ...used his being delayed by Danny Watts... - Confused on where this section was going.
 * in avoidance hitting a thin plastic - Needs a comma between avoidance and hitting
 * corner to pass Lieb for third three - Add a comma after third.
 * at the front of the car and Jarvis overtook it. - Wouldn't it be easier to split the two so it ends at the front of the car and then say that Jarvis passed them.
 * ...and then took up fuel. - Remove the word up here.
 * ...is a six-our sprint race. - Missing the H

Final comments
Other than those minor things that need to be fixed, I reckon this would be good to go.
 * Think I have addressed everything. Could you please take another look? Thank you MWright96 (talk) 08:36, 3 January 2022 (UTC)
 * That is all good. HawkAussie (talk) 08:39, 3 January 2022 (UTC)