Talk:2015 Blancpain Endurance Series

Full protection
Dear administrators,

I would like to request a full protection for this page, because this page is now 100% complete and this motorsport season has finished. It is perfect the way it is. Someone tries to redesign the whole page in a way that is everything but orderly. To secure this page from this "vandalism", I would like to request a full protection. Thank you in advance.

Yours faithfully,

Vettelisthebest

(This is my first request for protection, so I hope I am doing it the right way.) — Preceding unsigned comment added by Vettelisthebest (talk • contribs) 02:07, 22 October 2015‎ (UTC)


 * You are very strange person. Yes, we didn't have a consensus on a resuls rows. But why are you reverting even merging of the Position, Team and Points rows? In this article you didn't have any problems with it. Or it was your brother again? Corvus tristis (talk) 04:09, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: Sorry Vettelisthebest, but the Wikipedia policy on protection is to keep pages as open for editing as much as is possible. We don't protect pages pre-emptively, with only limited exceptions for things like high-risk templates. Also, the usual place for requesting protection is Requests for page protection. Best — Mr. Stradivarius  ♪ talk ♪ 05:53, 22 October 2015 (UTC)


 * The Third Opinion request made in reference to this page has been removed (i.e. declined) because like all other moderated content dispute resolution venues at Wikipedia, 3O requires thorough talk page discussion before seeking assistance. If other editor will not discuss, consider the recommendations which I make here. — TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 04:22, 28 October 2015 (UTC) (3O volunteer)

Drivers' Standings
The current tables unnecessary duplicates the same information and increases the volume of the article which is already violates WP:Article size. @Vettelisthebest returns his original table just because he like it. And he advised only the strange compromise that makes the table even worse that it can be in both cases. Corvus tristis (talk) 17:10, 28 October 2015 (UTC)

Edit war warning
I have left a edit war warning on both user's talk page. The reverting needs to stop and you both need to come here and discuss the issue. If either of you reverts again without substantial discussion, I'll report both of you to the edit war noticeboard. Note that the Three Revert Rule need not be violated in order for there to be actionable edit warring. You can seek an RFC with little or no discussion, but discussion is the right way to go, first. Once you've discussed the matter, then you can seek moderated content dispute resolution, if needed. But the reverting stops now. — TransporterMan  ( TALK ) 06:41, 3 November 2015 (UTC)