Talk:2015 British Grand Prix

Undercut
I saw you re-phrased the race part a bit and added the word "undercut". I refrained from using the term so far, because I have yet failed to find a good source describing what it is. While it is a regular term in F1 for the last two years, we should not use it here unless we can explain what it is to reader not so familiar with F1. Maybe you can find a good source? Zwerg Nase (talk) 08:58, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Forget it, found one :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:12, 6 July 2015 (UTC)


 * , that wasn't me. I'm not fussy on wording. I'll fix grammatical and spelling errors and such, but a complete rewrite isn't my MO. Honestly, your version was better. Whoever did rewrite it made it sound like a news article, which is a big no-no. Twirlypen (talk) 10:35, 6 July 2015 (UTC)
 * , Oh, then I saw that wrong. Thank you for the clarification! I'll go over the prose again before nominating it for GA. Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:38, 6 July 2015 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just added archive links to 1 one external link on 2015 British Grand Prix. Please take a moment to review my edit. If necessary, add after the link to keep me from modifying it. Alternatively, you can add to keep me off the page altogether. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/20150729204532/http://www.channelnewsasia.com:80/news/sport/motor-racing-vettel-wins/2009306.html to http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/sport/motor-racing-vettel-wins/2009306.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, please set the checked parameter below to true to let others know.

Cheers.—cyberbot II  Talk to my owner :Online 19:39, 26 February 2016 (UTC)