Talk:2015 FA Community Shield/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)

I'll review this asap. Zwerg Nase (talk) 16:18, 25 October 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

A close to flawless article. For one, I would recommend that in the "Background" section, you write having defeated Manchester City a year earlier instead of "ago". Sounds good? Also, there is a dead link that should be replaced with an archieved version.

On hold for now. Good job! Zwerg Nase (talk) 19:11, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Thanks for reviewing, I've replaced the dead link and tweaked the background section. Lemonade51 (talk) 21:34, 26 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Wonderful, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:36, 26 October 2015 (UTC)