Talk:2015 La Flèche Wallonne/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

On it! Zwerg Nase (talk) 10:48, 1 August 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Again, here just minor things:
 * As with the Amstel Gold Race, you should move the citations out of the lead.
 * Pre-race favourites: You should give Kwiatkowskis team.
 * Final loops around Huy: You take the information that Gilbert looked sore from the source. I would say, that that is too much POV on the author's part and should probably taken out.
 * Race finale: Same goes for the assertion that the break didn't have a chance at 12 km to go. That is mere speculation on the author's part and should not go into the article. I'm sure you can phrase it more neutral.
 * Same as with Amstel Gold race, you should add a row with a source at the bottom of the UCI standings table.

That's about it :) Seven days on hold, I'm sure we'll be done a lot earlier! Zwerg Nase (talk) 17:27, 5 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Thanks for the review, . All done, I think. Relentlessly (talk) 21:04, 5 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Wonderful, it's a pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 09:34, 6 August 2015 (UTC)