Talk:2015 Liège–Bastogne–Liège/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Zwerg Nase (talk · contribs) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)

On it. Zwerg Nase (talk) 21:10, 14 October 2015 (UTC)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:

Some minor things:
 * Background: In the first sentence, I think established would be a better term.

Oh, that's it. Made some more minor changes myself.


 * Good edits, thanks. I've moved the images back up a bit, though, because they were dropping down into the section below on very wide screens. I've also made all the many changes listed above! Thanks as ever, ZN. Relentlessly (talk) 16:14, 19 October 2015 (UTC)
 * Good job, as always! Pass :) Zwerg Nase (talk) 20:38, 19 October 2015 (UTC)