Talk:2015 Monaco GP2 Series round/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Jaguar (talk · contribs) 23:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi, I will be reviewing this against the GA criteria as part of a GAN sweep. I'll leave some comments soon. JAG UAR   23:04, 6 December 2016 (UTC)

Disambiguations: No links found.

Linkrot: No linkrot found in this article.

Checking against the GA criteria

 * GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose, no copyvios, spelling and grammar): b (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * "but was afflicted with misfortune: " I put my head down" - extra space
 * ✅ MWright96 (talk) 20:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * "Arthur Pic was fastest with a time of one minute" - Arthur Pic was the fastest with a time of one minute
 * I have changed to "Arthur Pic was the fastest driver with a time of one minute" MWright96 (talk) 20:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (reference section): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * No original research found.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * NPOV
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a (images are tagged and non-free content have fair use rationales): b (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/Fail:
 * Pass/Fail:

Excellent work as usual! I couldn't find any significant issues to raise (as usual), so I'll pass this now as it meets the criteria. Don't worry, this will be the last one I'll review for some time! JAG UAR   17:07, 7 December 2016 (UTC)

Thank you for the review. Both changes you suggested have been implemented. MWright96 (talk) 20:33, 7 December 2016 (UTC)