Talk:2015 Sadr City market truck bombing

Including Reactions sections
In regard to your edit here, reactions standard for such attack pages, even you don't 'like them'. Please see: .... numerous other bombing attacks495656778774 (talk) 23:26, 16 August 2015 (UTC)
 * 2015 Khan Bani Saad bombing
 * 2015 Sousse attacks
 * 2015 Kuwait mosque bombing


 * User:LimitationsAndRestrictions495656778774: it's certainly not a case of whether i like the sections or not. Reaction sections do have a place, I warrant, but not the sort exclusively containing empty rhetoric and meaningless platitudes as those you reinstated in the Tianjin explosions article or this Baghdad bombing article. For every current events article where there is a Reactions section with these soundbites, there is one (if not more) without. There is, for example July 2009 Ürümqi riots – a Featured Article, no less. I particularly like the Reactions section in 2011 Chinese pro-democracy protests, which captures reactions informatively and is low on unencyclopaedic content. I hope you see my point. Can we work towards achieving that standard of encyclopaedic content for this article? Regards, --  Ohc  ¡digame! 15:42, 18 August 2015 (UTC)