Talk:2015 Tour of Chongming Island World Cup/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: MPJ-DK (talk · contribs) 01:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

I will be picking up the review of this one - both for the Wiki Cup and the GA cup as well. I will be making my review comments over the next couple of days.

Side note, I would love some input on a couple of Featured List candidates, Mexican National Light Heavyweight Championship and NWA World Historic Welterweight Championship. I am not asking for Quid pro Quo, but all help is appreciated.  MPJ  -US 01:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)

GA Toolbox
I like to get this checked out first, I have found issues using this that has led to quick fails so it's important this passes muster.


 * Peer review tool
 * How about moving the picture of the winner up into the info box?
 * It's not a picture of the race, so I don't think that would be appropriate. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Copyright violations Tool
 * No problems ✅


 * Disambiguation links
 * No problems ✅


 * External links
 * The link "Chongming Island World Cup 2015" is dead
 * Wayback Machine archive linked. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "Giorgia Bronzini Wins the Tour of Chongming Island World Cup!" - seems to not work either
 * Ditto. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Well Written

 * So the lead does not actually state that this is a cycling race, it's somethig the reader has to infer from the various references made
 * Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "event, and a single-stage event" does not need the comma
 * Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "years, and started" again no need for a comma
 * Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * "ninety degree" should be "ninety-degree"
 * Fixed. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)

Sources/verifiable

 * Is "velofocus" a reliable source?
 * The rest look reliable etc.

Broad in coverage

 * There is no follow up on the race, no reviews or opinions on the race? was it boring? Uneventful? did it make a different to the 2015 standings overall? Put it in perspective please.

Neutral

 * No problems ✅

Stable

 * No problems ✅

Illustrated / Images

 * No problems ✅


 * - That's my complete review, not a ton of issues. I am putting the article on hold for up to 7 days to allow for updates to be made.  MPJ  -US 02:05, 9 April 2016 (UTC)


 * no activity in five days. If still nothing in 2 days i will have to fail it.  MPJ  -US 17:11, 14 April 2016 (UTC)

, has indicated that he's not going to be around much at present. I'll do my best to sort your concerns out, though it's possible I won't get to it in the next couple of days. Relentlessly (talk) 08:31, 15 April 2016 (UTC)
 * - I would like to see some activity on this by tomorrow to justify keeping the review open.  MPJ  -US 12:41, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * Sorry to hear there's such a rush, . I'll need to do some research for some of it, but I've responded to what I could do immediately above. Relentlessly (talk) 14:38, 17 April 2016 (UTC)
 * - I did not mean to imply it all had to be done, but it had sat inactive for a while and I wanted some activity at least to make sure this had not been forgotten.  MPJ  -US 14:42, 17 April 2016 (UTC)


 * Upon rereview I believe this is now a Good Article.  MPJ  -US 18:43, 17 April 2016 (UTC)