Talk:2016 Czech Senate election

A better template for the results
I hope this can prove useful, if anyone else has time to work on it. Also, the Reuters story: Gabrielthursday (talk) 19:04, 17 October 2016 (UTC)

Thanks very much. I've put the information into that new format. I haven't transposed data for all those parties, I have included every party which reached a run-off.. but I will leave the original table here in case anyone wants to add lower polling parties. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Jdcooper (talk • contribs)
 * Thanks for updating the table, but the seat figures are flawed - there are 10 seats won in this election that are not in the total seats column. Where are they? If we cannot account for them, I cannot see how we can continue to include the columns. Cheers, Number   5  7  09:06, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * I don't understand your question, what seats are you referring to? The "seats won" column adds up to 27, which is correct. There is some data missing from the final three columns, but I couldn't find this information on other articles about the Senate because they have not been updated yet. It needs a source, that's all. Also, could you put the column about number of run-offs back in the table? In my opinion the format of the table shown above is easier to understand than the list we have on the page now, which doesn't distinguish between parties that didn't get into any run-offs. Jdcooper (talk) 11:14, 28 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The seats won column is correct. The total seats column is the problem because whilst it correctly totals to 81, it does not include the 10 seats won by TOP 09, Mayors and Independents, the Green Party, Mayors for Liberec Region, Nestraníci, Patriotic Citizens, Movement for Prague 11 and the independent. This means 10 seats that you have given to other parties in this column are not in fact held by them. Unless you can rectify this, the column cannot be included because it is patently wrong. I would suggest that if you are unable to find the correct figures to put in it, we delete it until you can. With regards to distinguising parties that didn't make it to the second ruond, I think should be clear enough from the fact that they received no votes in the second round that they didn't qualify? Cheers, Number   5  7  11:26, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Actually, my bad, I didn't realise it didn't actually total 81. However, it's still not very good having empty cells... Number   5  7  11:28, 28 October 2016 (UTC)

removed category:annulled elections
I've removed the category annulled election because the elections were only done over in 1 of the 27 districts, while all other elections within that category are elections that were annulled nationally, for the whole territory.Bancki (talk) 09:50, 5 September 2017 (UTC)