Talk:2016 International Champions Cup

Juventus didn't win
Atletico Madrid and the Melbourne Victory had a match where the latter defeated the former 1-0. Since Melbourne gets three points, that puts them on top of the table, making them the victors of their group. Can someone change this? 69.122.135.223 (talk) 03:16, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * If you look at the ICC's website, which is the source used, it clearly states Juventus finished first. The match between Melbourne Victory and Atletico was simply a friendly, nothing more, not at all associated with the International Champions Cup. So unless the ICC says Melbourne Victory finished first, the article should not include the match, and should list Juventus as champions. Secret Agent Julio (talk) 04:38, 2 August 2016 (UTC)
 * And FIFA always are fair and just and never cheat!! We must remember that....--HandballHero (talk) 05:20, 7 August 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 International Champions Cup. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160729075420/http://www.internationalchampionscup.com/matches/63 to http://www.internationalchampionscup.com/matches/63

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 18:52, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Melbourne si the Australia Champion 2016
Melbourne won 1-0 at Atlético de Madrid. The champion is Melbourne, not Juventus. The standings say that Juventus played two games, and Melbourne and Atlético de Madrid will play only one. It's not logical! The sponsors and the television broadcast were like all the ICC parties, therefore, it should be considered the same. The fact that the website was not updated with that result, should not change the facts, even that website does not even exist today. --201.183.100.208 (talk) 17:14, 27 July 2019 (UTC)