Talk:2016 Jim Beam strike/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 23:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

I'll be taking a look at this! —  Ghost River  23:19, 4 December 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lede

 * Delink Kentucky per MOS:OVERLINK
 * Done.
 * Missing "included" or a synonym after The primary concerns of the members involved,
 * Done.
 * "distilleries were reporting" "distilleries reported"
 * Done.
 * Comma after "resumed on October 18"
 * Done.
 * De-quote "contingency plan" per MOS:QUOTEPOV and per the fact it is not in quotes in the body
 * Done.

Background

 * Delink "Kentucky" per above
 * Done.
 * No comma after "from large alcohol companies"
 * Done.
 * "at their facilities in Clermont and Boston, Kentucky"
 * Done.
 * "was trying to get" "wanted"
 * Done.
 * "would not cause any noticeable shortage," "would not have a significant effect on product availability,"
 * Done.
 * Then link "shortage" in "could cause shortages"
 * Done.
 * "about 5" "about five" per MOS:NUMERAL
 * Done.

Course of the strike

 * Comma after "in Loretto, Kentucky" per MOS:GEOCOMMA
 * Done.
 * "On October 21," "The next day,"
 * Done.
 * "was in general successful" "was a general success"
 * Done.

General comments

 * Photo used is relevant and available for use
 * No stability concerns in the revision history
 * Earwig's copyvio tool is not working for me at the moment, so I am assuming good faith based on previous GA reviews and some spot checks
 * This is a general question more than anything. Your strike articles often include some section on long-term impact; it has been five years since the Jim Beam strike, so are there any more developments we can pull from that? I wouldn't include the 2019 warehouse fire, since that was an act of God, which is why I am asking in curiosity.
 * Unfortunately, I was not able to find much information on the long-term impact of the strike from any reliable sources, but if I do, I will be sure to update the article accordingly.

Thank you for your patience. Putting on hold now. —  Ghost River  17:19, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * , I just wanted to reach out and say that I have made some edits to the article addressing the comments in your review. Thank you again for beginning this review, and if there are any further comments, questions, or concerns, please feel free to reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 18:35, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
 * No worries on the long-term impact; you can't be expected to include information that doesn't exist. Passing now. —  Ghost River  15:35, 28 December 2021 (UTC)