Talk:2016 Old Iliamna earthquake

Injured?
In the table on left is an information, that one person get injuries by this quake, but in the source isnt something like this. Is this informaion true ore a fake?

--217.24.225.140 (talk) 17:06, 27 January 2016 (UTC)


 * The references got slightly jumbled, but have been fixed now. Thanks for bringing this to our attention.Juneau Mike (talk) 06:08, 28 January 2016 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2016 Old Iliamna earthquake. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20160124215652/http://www.ktuu.com/news/news/strong-earthquake-with-initial-magnitude-of-about-71-hits-south-alaska/37610068 to http://www.ktuu.com/news/news/strong-earthquake-with-initial-magnitude-of-about-71-hits-south-alaska/37610068

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 20:12, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

Foreshock?
In July 2015, six months before the 2016 event, there was a 6.3 earthquake that hit around the same location and depth as the 2016 event. Should the 2015 event be considered a foreshock to the 2016 earthquake? 24.237.72.63 (talk) 22:31, 27 May 2019 (UTC)


 * The two earthquakes also have similar focal mechanisms. However, we can only consider it as a foreshock if a reliable source thinks that it is. Mikenorton (talk) 15:32, 28 May 2019 (UTC)