Talk:2016 Women's Tour de Yorkshire/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Hawkeye7 (talk · contribs) 23:35, 4 August 2016 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria A rather slim article, but meh
 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * Some points below
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * See below
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All images have appropriate licences
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * All images have appropriate licences
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:


 * Spelling and Grammar
 * First sentence of the lead: "2016 Womens Tour de Yorkshire" apostrophe required
 * And again in the second sentence
 * "intermeidate" should be "intermediate"
 * "WorldTour" should be "World Tour"


 * References
 * Can we have access dates for the web references? This will allow us to repair them if link rot sets in. (I checked, and all are still working, so you can use today's date.)
 * Reference required for the first sentence of Race overview.


 * As the nominator appears to be away at the moment I have stepped in and done the changes that you have suggested apart from WorldTour. The linked article is currently located at UCI Women's WorldTour but that article is inconsistent in using both World Tour and WorldTour. May be that article needs moving to have a space in it and updating to use the term consistently. Keith D (talk) 00:02, 8 August 2016 (UTC)
 * No worries. Striking that issue. All points addressed. Hawkeye7 (talk) 00:59, 8 August 2016 (UTC)