Talk:2017 Australian Open – Women's singles

Where is it "common practice" to include flags before a result is known?
Pretty sure any newspaper editor would reject such a diagram and tell the writer to get rid of the flag. It just looks odd, unprofessional, geeky even. Show me one single professional publication that does it. MaxBrowne (talk) 01:51, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * Everyone on Wikipedia does it - includes a flag for the next round if two players from the same country are playing. And I'm not going to argue or continue past this point. Thanks. MasterMind5991 (talk) 06:39, 17 January 2017 (UTC)
 * "Everyone on wikipedia does it" is a pathetically weak argument. Wikipedia is not a crystal ball - we don't know that both players won't withdraw or be disqualified. Besides, it adds no information to the article. MaxBrowne (talk) 07:29, 17 January 2017 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified one external link on 2017 Australian Open – Women's Singles. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20140101013853/http://www.ausopen.com/en_AU/scores/draws/ws/index.html to http://www.ausopen.com/en_AU/scores/draws/ws/index.html

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 03:06, 22 June 2017 (UTC)