Talk:2017 NHL expansion draft

Protected list
Is it necessary to have that huge chart of the protected list in here? Doesn't appear to be the norm for past expansion draft articles, and maybe a citation that links to a published article is sufficient? Ultimately I would think that list of who IS drafted, and not who can't be, would be most important after results are announced. Echoedmyron (talk) 16:22, 21 June 2017 (UTC)
 * I kind of agree. Frankly, it should be unprotected players that are shown because they are eligible. LordAtlas (talk) 00:20, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * Agreed, the results of the expansion draft should be the focal point of this article, not the protection lists for the other NHL teams. Ho-ju-96 (talk) 07:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)
 * See: Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Ice Hockey/Archive69--SaskatchewanSenator (talk) 21:44, 8 June 2018 (UTC)

Move discussion in progress
There is a move discussion in progress on Talk:1991 NHL Dispersal and Expansion Drafts which affects this page. Please participate on that page and not in this talk page section. Thank you. —RMCD bot 03:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)