Talk:2018 Clemson Tigers football team/GA1

@Ostealthy

Just so you know this is my first GA review so if I did something wrong let me know or fix it if you can. Thank you!

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass! Good work!Twooeight (talk) 01:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC) The article does have one tag, so it would be nice if you could resolve that, and I added two things as well that improved the article. Also, in the game summaries section, if the teams playing was directly above the summary it would be better than having it be there and then the rest of the summary from the last game on the side. Not sure how much sense that made but if you look at the game summaries section I’m sure you’ll know what I mean. Congratulations! Twooeight (talk) 01:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass! Good work!Twooeight (talk) 01:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC) The article does have one tag, so it would be nice if you could resolve that, and I added two things as well that improved the article. Also, in the game summaries section, if the teams playing was directly above the summary it would be better than having it be there and then the rest of the summary from the last game on the side. Not sure how much sense that made but if you look at the game summaries section I’m sure you’ll know what I mean. Congratulations! Twooeight (talk) 01:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * Pass! Good work!Twooeight (talk) 01:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC) The article does have one tag, so it would be nice if you could resolve that, and I added two things as well that improved the article. Also, in the game summaries section, if the teams playing was directly above the summary it would be better than having it be there and then the rest of the summary from the last game on the side. Not sure how much sense that made but if you look at the game summaries section I’m sure you’ll know what I mean. Congratulations! Twooeight (talk) 01:43, 22 August 2019 (UTC)