Talk:2018 Sukma attack

No unilateral redirection
I've restored the article as there seems to be some confusion as to how we're supposed to treat this situation. Reverting and deleting creations by sockpuppets is allowed, but that doesn't mean "mandatory". If a user in good standing restores a sock's edits, taking responsibility for them and making them their own, as did here and reemphasized here, then you can't revert them as a sock. Unilateral redirection (as an exercise of CSD G5) is not valid once a non-sock restores the content with their endorsement, and would then constitute an out of process deletion of content added by an established editor in good standing. Please do not restore the redirect without taking this to AfD. S warm  ♠  02:13, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I have nominated. Consider adding this sentence on main page:-

Capitals00 (talk) 05:56, 26 March 2018 (UTC)

Protected edit request on 26 March 2018
Can links be added please, for Maoist (in the lead section) and Naxalite ? Thanks, The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:02, 26 March 2018 (UTC) The Mighty Glen (talk) 09:02, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * I was just about to request the same 2 links. E.M.Gregory (talk) 11:02, 26 March 2018 (UTC)
 * ✅ &mdash; Martin (MSGJ · talk) 20:21, 26 March 2018 (UTC)