Talk:2019 Estonian parliamentary election

Untitled
I don't have the skills to do it, but every reference to the "Pro Patria" party (esp in the tables) needs to be updated to the party's new name, Isamaa. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meyestone (talk • contribs) 17 November 2019 (UTC)

Brown seems to be wrong colour for the Conservative party
Dark blue looks appropriate. Brown is historically tied to facism and Hitlerism and that makes no sense and would be an insult.46.93.250.54 (talk) 23:33, 3 March 2019 (UTC)

I would just like to note that all of these parties are fake democrats who are suppressing every other political movement in the country for their own selfish benefits! Fake nationalists' color should also be pink, not blue, to bring more attention to the growing issue. The rest should be just scarlet red to point out even more facts. 91.129.111.83 (talk) 15:02, 4 March 2019 (UTC)
 * Wikipedia is not a forum. Please limit your discussions to factual sources on how to improve this article. Colour for any party is subjective and can be upgraded, especially when there is consensus. EKRE's official colours are dark blue, so that can be used instead of the brown. Blomsterhagens (talk) 11:40, 17 November 2019 (UTC)

The Electoral Maps Seem to Portray the Electoral method in the wrong way
By making the maps based on the largest party per constituency, it makes it seem like Estonia uses FPTP, which it of course does not. I'd recommend that another map be added that has the actual results per constituency (ie illustrates each party that one rather than just the largest). If we agree on this, I can make said map if need be (in fact, I kind of want to). Ayvind-Bjarnason (talk) 15:37, 4 May 2021 (UTC)
 * I think this is just a matter of phrasing. I've changed it to something I hope is a bit better. Number   5  7  20:39, 4 May 2021 (UTC)

Seat counts for the constituencies.
According to the article (and based off of this source) the seat counts for districts 1, 4, 7 and 11 are 10, 15, 7, and 8 respectively. However, the list of elected members puts them at 11, 13, 6, and 10. Which one is right? They come from the same source, yet they contradict. Do the compensation mandates have something to do with it? I'm quite confused. Ayvind-Bjarnason (talk) 22:37, 6 May 2021 (UTC)