Talk:2019 India doctors' strike

Notability
Have been thinking of this (and spotted your sub-page) :-) Does this pass NOTNEWS? How'bout creating an article about the broader topic of violence against doctors, in West Bengal? &#x222F; WBG converse 09:42, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The single event of the assault probably doesn't meet NOTNEWS, hence I proceeded to cover the events ensuing since, which meet the notability guidelines due to the wide coverage. A broader article on the violence against doctors probably would work, but that would be a good thing to background this article from and better as a stand-alone one supplementing this one (is there one already?). -- qedk ( t  桜  c ) 10:03, 12 June 2019 (UTC)

Media biases and all that
Also, Telegraph is quite unreliable for coverage of this issue; way pro-TMC bias refers to the fact that the Telegraph (and frankly, the entire local group) leans towards TMC and away from BJP, politically. It is as valid as saying that Republic/ZeeNews is a pro-BJP media-organisation (or for me, a BJP mouthpiece) or that National Herald is a pro-INC outlet or that Fox leans towards the GOP. And, to perceive that as a comment on the editor's biases (and thus deeming that as a PA) is ridiculous and equivalent of stating that whoever is working on User:Winged Blades of Godric/Indian Media and the surrounding locus, are making gross personal attacks against whoever are using those sources. . &#x222F; WBG converse 05:23, 14 June 2019 (UTC)


 * No, I thought that the personal attack was against me, the use of a semi-colon indicates (to me) that it was unrelated from your first part of the statement but since you stated that the comment was related to the source, it is definitely not a personal attack — I'm alright with it. -- qedk ( t  桜  c ) 05:29, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * On that note though, I find The Telegraph more moderate among news sources established primarily in Calcutta. There's ABP News who are quite variant on who they support (they were pro-TMC at one point unbelievably). I prefer TT among the local sources for that reason but they are indeed more soft-spoken on AITC than a truly neutral newspaper should be. -- qedk ( t  桜  c ) 05:35, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , thanks. That was a mis-typed semicolon:-(
 * ABP Ananda's political leanings fluctuate too often and the swings are often too weird to reason (for me). I agree, that of all the Calcutta based papers, TT is quite excellent, as to news quality but some additional care is warranted when using them on anything involving TMC's political fortunes. &#x222F; WBG converse 05:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ABP Ananda's political leanings fluctuate too often and the swings are often too weird to reason (for me). I agree, that of all the Calcutta based papers, TT is quite excellent, as to news quality but some additional care is warranted when using them on anything involving TMC's political fortunes. &#x222F; WBG converse 05:57, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Assessment
I am of the opinion that this article is at least C-class now, if you guys disagree, can you expand on why not and what I need to do to reach C-class and if it does meet C-class, what more do I need to do to meet B-class, thanks. -- qedk ( t  桜  c ) 18:13, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * , I understand precisely nothing about these assessments (except the MILHIST ratings, stub, GA and FA) and the system has lost it's real value, much earlier (it was initially designed for CD editions and all that....). At any case, I have never ever cared for the assessments in my rewrite of multiple articles and thus, unable to opine. This can be taken to GA though, with inclusion of considerable background (search the newspaper archives and there's loads of sources) and earlier events of similar manner; I plan to do that, pursuant to certain other factors.  &#x222F; WBG converse 18:21, 14 June 2019 (UTC)
 * As a writer of primarily stub articles, I'm pretty ignorant about assessments too, thanks either way. Notably though, this seems to be sprawling off into a national movement and might soon need a move to 2019 India doctors' strike as circumstances arise (and to think, there was a time I considered "2019 Kolkata doctors' strike"!), let's see. -- qedk ( t  桜  c ) 18:31, 14 June 2019 (UTC)

Vote Bank
Current cm Mamta benerjee didnt take proper decision just coz of muslims vote bank Avi3095 (talk) 16:56, 15 June 2019 (UTC)

Justification of violence by chief minster
Mamta is trying to justify violence and even tone in the lead section in this article is like that. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Mamta has no Mamta (talk • contribs) 10:52, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 16 June 2019
Not "cpim backed doctors forum" 117.194.41.19 (talk) 20:45, 16 June 2019 (UTC)
 * The Telegraph source states it as "CPM-backed". What is your source for not CPIM-backed? -- qedk ( t  桜  c ) 21:24, 16 June 2019 (UTC)

The Subject
The subject should be changed from "2019 West Bengal/India Doctors' Strike" to "Bengal's White Coat Revolution" as suggested by all the Medical Colleges in West Bengal. Dr. Manas Das (talk) 18:19, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 17 June 2019
The protest ended today after a meeting with the CM of westbengal. 2405:204:41A9:8B79:0:0:2209:60A4 (talk) 19:12, 17 June 2019 (UTC)
 * ✅ --<span style="font-family:'Trebuchet MS',Geneva,sans-serif"> qedk ( t  桜  c ) 21:08, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 19 June 2019
Change of heading from "2019 India Doctors strike" To "Bengal's White Coat Revolution, 2019"} Debarghya Pan (talk) 14:25, 19 June 2019 (UTC)
 * Move-protection-shackle.svg Not done: page move requests should be made at Requested moves. &#8209;&#8209; El Hef  ( Meep? ) 14:40, 19 June 2019 (UTC)