Talk:2019 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election

A Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:51, 24 September 2019 (UTC)
 * JayantPatil.png

Semi-protected edit request on 24 October 2019
In congress, this election is being led by the current congress Pradesh Pramukh Balasaheb Thorat and that should reflect on this page. Use the following for reference. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maharashtra_Pradesh_Congress_Committee Sapanparikh18 (talk) 08:35, 24 October 2019 (UTC)
 * ❌ Wikipedia is not a reliable source. Can you provide a newspaper article which says Thorat is leading this election? §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 08:52, 24 October 2019 (UTC)

Semi-protected edit request on 25 October 2019
The overall vote share of BJP in 2014 was 27.8. The figure 31.15 is for the vote share in constituencies where they have contested. So the dip is 2.05%. https://eci.gov.in/files/file/3726-maharashtra-2014/?do=download&csrfKey=952b6d47f80c0b3c6ea41ccbbca2d896 In page 16 you can verify this.Sharafalik (talk) 04:44, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: please provide reliable sources that support the change you want to be made. That link does not work. NiciVampireHeart 18:16, 27 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Sorry My mistake. It was a direct link to download the pdf file. Apparently it gets expired after some time. Here is link to the download page https://eci.gov.in/files/file/3726-maharashtra-2014/ . You have to manually download the pdf. you can verify my claim from the pdf. Its in page 16 of the pdf. (Sharafalik (talk) 05:31, 28 October 2019 (UTC))
 * Yes check.svg Done--Goldsztajn (talk) 00:22, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Gangakhed Ratnakar gutte
I want to add on Wikipedia Drprsk10 (talk) 08:52, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
 * This is not the right page to request additional user rights. You can open an edit request with the specific changes to be made, and someone will add them for you, or you can wait until you are autoconfirmed and edit the page yourself. NiciVampireHeart 18:19, 27 October 2019 (UTC)

Changes
I've changed TBA to To be updated as the results are already announced. thank you -- ✝iѵ ɛɳ  २२४० †ลℓк †๏ мэ 05:59, 28 October 2019 (UTC)

Incorrect total ?
Hi everyone,

I noticed that the total number of seats does not make 288, but 284. According to this site, there are small differences between what is currently displayed and the official results. Example : BVA, 3 seats instead of 2. Can anyone check this ? The page is currently semi-protected, and I don't want to make mistakes. Tpe.g5.stan (talk) 14:46, 29 October 2019 (UTC)
 * Offical results here. Looks likes the following are missing from the table: Krantikari Shetkari Party (1), Jan Surajya Shakti (1), Prahar Janshakti Party (2).--Goldsztajn (talk) 00:38, 30 October 2019 (UTC)

Proposed merge of 2019 Maharashtra political crisis into 2019 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election
The so called "political crisis" is part of government formation and hence should be sub-section in the election article itself. Its just a part of result and the events that led to government formation. §§Dharmadhyaksha§§ {Talk / Edits} 02:59, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * The "political crisis" can be summarized as a sub-section and main article is for detailed information. No need of merger. As Opinion polling for the 2019 Indian general election is also a part of 2019 Indian general election but have a separate article for details. <i style="color:#F00000">Manasbose</i> {Talk / Edits} 6:43, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Political crisis article is 8k, Maha election is 170K. Opinion poll is 126K and main election 187K. It makes sense to split the opinion poll from main election. How is merging of 8K into 170K comparable with 300K bulk? Apart from just size considerations; what benefit do you get in splitting relevant info into two pages? §§<i style="color:#E0115F">Dharmadhyaksha</i>§§ {Talk / Edits} 06:18, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose Different topics. 112.133.244.27 (talk) 08:05, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Political crisis are not part of any election. 2019 Karnataka political crisis has a separate article from 2018 Karnataka Legislative Assembly election. And every political crisis in the world have their separate Wikipedia pages.This one can not be any exception. <i style="color:#F00000">Manasbose</i> {Talk / Edits} 8:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Oppose. The political crisis is still under development. 2019 Maharashtra political crisis article size may increase. 14.139.128.24 (talk) 12:19, 25 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Support - I don't think this is a standalone article that is needed. We should merge it. And add a subsection of poltical crisis if needed. But making a whole article isn't needed here. Edward Zigma (talk) 15:32, 25 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose - Election and Government formation crisis are two different events. Government formation is an aftermath of the election. The event is progressing and the article will be further expanded with more information. Election article is already too long so an independent article on the crisis will be helpful to the readers as well.-Nizil (talk) 07:10, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose as per comments from Nizil and Manas. They are, though interlinked, but two different events. Also, because the timeline of this crisis has been long due, this article might be equally long as the election article with a little summary in the said article. -- ♪Karthik♫ ♪Nadar♫ 09:37, 26 November 2019 (UTC)
 * Oppose Similar to the 2019 Karnataka political crisis, this has seen a chain of events including President's Rule in the state. --Rsrikanth05 (talk) 10:06, 26 November 2019 (UTC)


 * Support I support the merging of the articles because this is a part of the ongoing government formation process which would indeed turn out to be lengthy due to multiple institutions of government in play. I also support this merger because there is no point to have a stand-alone article for this. This event would also set a precedent for strengthening institutions of Indian Judiciary, Legislature and Executives which would just be a summary of the complete timeline. Amdudeja (talk) 11:15, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Seats before don't seem to add up
The "seats before" don't seem to add up 142+75+29+54+1+2 is 303 in a 288 seat assembly. And if I compare seats before to "last election", they also don't seem to add up. BJP gained 20 seats via bypoll (or defections?), Shiv Sena 12, UPA 12. NCP lost 12, but unless there were a lot of independents or people in other parties and per 2014 Maharashtra Legislative Assembly election, there doesn't seem to have been, where did the other 32 seats gained after the last election come from? Nil Einne (talk) 14:53, 23 December 2019 (UTC)

Changes to vote % and links
@Angole17637 Can you please check this edit and respond what you are trying to do. It seems you made several unintentional edits without any WP:EDITSUMMARY. Venkat TL (talk) 16:43, 24 May 2022 (UTC)