Talk:2019 World Cup (snooker)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: ArnabSaha (talk · contribs) 05:24, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it well written?
 * A. The prose is clear and concise, and the spelling and grammar are correct:
 * B. It complies with the manual of style guidelines for lead sections, layout, words to watch, fiction, and list incorporation:
 * 1) Is it verifiable with no original research?
 * A. It contains a list of all references (sources of information), presented in accordance with the layout style guideline:
 * B. All in-line citations are from reliable sources, including those for direct quotations, statistics, published opinion, counter-intuitive or controversial statements that are challenged or likely to be challenged, and contentious material relating to living persons&mdash;science-based articles should follow the scientific citation guidelines:
 * C. It contains no original research:
 * D. It contains no copyright violations nor plagiarism:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. It addresses the main aspects of the topic:
 * B. It stays focused on the topic without going into unnecessary detail (see summary style):
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Didn't find any other issues. Passed.
 * It represents viewpoints fairly and without editorial bias, giving due weight to each:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * It does not change significantly from day to day because of an ongoing edit war or content dispute:
 * 1) Is it illustrated, if possible, by images?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Didn't find any other issues. Passed.
 * B. Images are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail: Didn't find any other issues. Passed.
 * Pass or Fail: Didn't find any other issues. Passed.

Comments

 * "The World cup was split into a group stage, and a knockout stage." --> comma not necessary after "stage"
 * Done Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * "During knockout stage, matches were played as best-of-seven-frames." --> During "the" knockout. Add "the"
 * Done Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * "In the decider Jack Lisowski beat Thepchaiya" --> comma after "decider"
 * Done Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Add author's name in citations. (Example- author name not mentioned in [13]).
 * Got the ones I could find, let me know if I missed any. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:32, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * The date format in citations aren't uniform. (Example- some have "2019-06-17", some "27 September 2020". I will suggest changing them to the 27 September 2020 format).
 * Fixed, forgot to run the script. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:29, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * , btw, which script is it?  ❯❯❯  S A H A   20:46, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * User:Ohconfucius/script/MOSNUM dates
 * If possible an image for infobox.
 * Done Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)

 ❯❯❯  S A H A   20:23, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, thanks for the review, I've covered the above points. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 20:36, 4 October 2020 (UTC)
 * Congrats  ❯❯❯  S A H A   20:50, 4 October 2020 (UTC)