Talk:2020–21 ŠK Slovan Bratislava season

The article
what is your problem? You know you should not add all schedule and you know should not remove other editors content just because it doesn't appeals to you. Understand?--Sakiv (talk) 14:13, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

There is absolutely no rational point why an entire schedule should not be added, just because you do not like it. Once it is scheduled, people are obviously curious when and where will the team play. There is no point in "hiding" this information at all. Understand? Penepi (talk) 16:16, 25 July 2020 (UTC)
 * Obviously, you do not want to compromise and only want what you write. You are behaving in a way that will block you just wait. I remind you of a very clear policy that no user has the right to act as the owner of an article.--Sakiv (talk) 14:22, 25 July 2020 (UTC)

Stop your behaviour
I did not remove your edits. In fact I did as you wanted and removed "Pre-season and friendlies" and changed it to just "Friendlies". It's you who are creating all this mess for no logical reason. I did bring to you a clear policy which says An overlinked article contains an excessive number of links, making it difficult to identify links likely to aid the reader's understanding significantly. This is not new but done in Real Madrid, Barcelona, Liverpool, Manchester City season articles. What will the reader benefit from 69 links to the same word??--Sakiv (talk) 21:00, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

The issue here is your style. You showed up here like a guru who dictates everything, although you hadn't added anything to the previous seasons' articles. Of course I do have some sort of relationship to the pages since I have created them on my very own and will defend certain aspects such as structure etc. Yet I definitely do not - and never will - claim I am the owner or anything similar. As for the overlinking, I do not have problem with that if you really find it necessary. On one hand, as you say, it might not be too beneficial. On the other hand, I don't find it like a problem. It doesn't make the article any worse, and reader has the option to click on certain pages at several places, not just one.--Penepi (talk) 21:07, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Finally, did you discover that it was better not to link every mention of Slovan Bratislava! I think the cause of disagreement is that you want to have the article for yourself and not allow any other editor interested in football in general to have their say. The fact that you created the 2018-19 and 2019-20 article has nothing to say to this article. There is a ton of coincidences where season articles changes their structure and formats. You can see, right now Solvan Bratislava is already linked in the lead, the infobox as well as the table so 3 links is more than enough.--Sakiv (talk) 21:15, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

No, I haven't ever said I won't allow any other editors to have their say, that is just your bold assumption. There is no prescribed structure for a football club season's page. Almost every club has a different structure, so obviously I will insist on the structure I have been using so far as I consider it the most clear for the club in question. Everyone, including you, is welcome to add anything useful to the page, I will be more than happy. But so far you were only focusing on trifles which did not bring anything useful, in fact you did more harm than good by, for instance, putting the page to wrong category, changing the structure for a primitive one, etc.-Penepi (talk) 21:29, 27 July 2020 (UTC)


 * You are only focusing on small mistakes, in order to never allow me to edit just because you are a fan of this team. I did nothing harmful, it was you who threw my whole contributions and replaced them with your's just because they are somehow different than your structure. I can not find any exit from this situation as you are very stubborn and not just that but also aggressive. Regarding the wrong nationality in the category, I would have corrected it, had it not been for you who edited at the same time. btw you should not add a double protection request for the same article and please don't use the very same words I use again. --Sakiv (talk) 21:33, 27 July 2020 (UTC)


 * Obviously I am focusing on small mistakes because that is all you managed to do here and you are still acting arrogant like your edits are the most beneficial. Keep your opinion of me to yourself, that is completely irrelevant. I don't do anything other than you do. Penepi (talk) 07:57, 28 July 2020 (UTC)


 * I apologize for Wikipedia for my inappropriate behaviour and I guarantee that this won't happen again.--Sakiv (talk) 17:39, 28 July 2020 (UTC)