Talk:2020 Delhi riots

This article is incorrect and a shame
This article seems to be written by some propagandists and completely different than the reality. This riot was started by Muslim mob and later was retaliated by Hindu mob in which many were killed. No wonder why this article has been locked. The group managing this article are same like UNRWA staff who aided terrorist Hamas under banner of UN. May be this post might create uneasiness so suggesting to lock the Talk section also. 2401:7400:6025:6C67:2996:659F:915A:B2F0 (talk) 10:40, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Not according to RS. Do we need a FAQ?Slatersteven (talk) 12:17, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Maybe, although it's been pretty quiet here recently. 331dot (talk) 12:20, 30 March 2024 (UTC)
 * Because you cowards get everyone who disagrees with you blocked. Spineless illegal offsprings of Muslim mobs are moderating this page. 49.204.192.214 (talk) 09:34, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Now blocked. Please take your religious bigotry elsewhere. 331dot (talk) 10:39, 9 June 2024 (UTC)
 * Po da Patti Naayinda Mone 2405:201:E002:1133:B8CE:F64E:6427:BB6B (talk) 16:54, 12 June 2024 (UTC)
 * No its because we obey policy, such as wp:npa. Slatersteven (talk)

Peace loving Hindus
Hindus are peace loving and have put up with 800 years of oppression by foreign rulers. They were not only looted but their very culture was attacked. A cabal wanted to disrupt peace during Trump's visit to India and was responsible in creating riots. Yes, it always starts with minority leaders creating fear in their followers and have them massacred in the riots even as they stay safe in comfort. Roshan Baig was preparing for the riots in advance. Hinduism is inclusive. Unfortunately, others are not. The wiki narrative is biased. 43.247.156.67 (talk) 11:21, 7 April 2024 (UTC)


 * Any mention of Hindus is not meant to describe all Hindus. This article summarizes what independent reliable sources say about this topic, and they say Hindu mobs attacked Muslims. This does not mean that all Hindus agreed with doing so, but this is what sources say happened.
 * It is difficult to address the concern "this is biased". If you are interested in discussing your concerns, please detail the specific problematic passages of this article and explain how they do not accurately summarize the sources- or any other specific concern. 331dot (talk) 12:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * Independent who😊 43.247.156.67 (talk) 12:38, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * reliable sources Slatersteven (talk) 15:24, 7 April 2024 (UTC)
 * you mean sources tha5 pay the wikipedia for bias? Or the ones who want to bully and sway opinions, an intellegence project? How do we determine whether you or the reliable source are unbiased or a paid worker? Very questionable,non transparent motives with no accountability. I see how this page is being used for culture bullying. A clear case racism and supremacy tactics. Very insensitive and shamelss brazen tactics. 69.181.244.117 (talk) 02:46, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * That's a very serious accusation. I suggest that you present your evidence of this to the reliable sources noticeboard. 331dot (talk) 09:20, 10 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I'm sorry that Hindus have been picked on for 800 years, as you say. You can choose to live with those feelings and hate us, people who weren't responsible for that oppression, or set aside your personal feelings and work with us. Again, please point out any problematic passages that do not accurately summarize the sources provided. If the sources themselves are the problem, you need to address that at the reliable sources noticeboard, as I've indicated. Note that most Indian sources have too much of a dog in this fight to be journalistically neutral, and India does not have a strong history of press freedom(i.e The Emergency (India)). 331dot (talk) 09:25, 10 July 2024 (UTC)

Wp:soap. Slatersteven (talk) 10:10, 10 July 2024 (UTC)