Talk:2020 Hpakant jade mine disaster/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: The Rambling Man (talk · contribs) 09:52, 31 August 2021 (UTC)

Comments
 * I think a two-para lead would suffice here, for the size of the article.
 * "the Hpakant area" appears to be piped to a redirect back to Hpakant.
 * ✅, Hpakant was originally at Phakant, it was Talk:Hpakant as the Hpakant is more prevalent.
 * "The disaster took place on 2 July 2020" I would put the date in the opening sentence.
 * "Myanmar's jade industry is worth US$790 million" as of when?
 * ✅, DW did not have a date for 790 and I couldn't find a different source (that wasn't a mirror/copy/copied-through of DW) quoting 790 in a search now - so replaced with 750 million for 2016-2017 from Reuters.
 * "175-200" in infobox should be an en-dash, not a hyphen.
 * "US$15–31 billion" that was 30 to 31 in the lead...
 * ✅ (removed from lead per condensation above + monetary estimates are all over the place so replaced with 70%-90% of the world jade supply).
 * "operators.[7]These" space after ref.
 * "in a moonscape-like scene devoid of trees" this is a bit POV, is it attributable to someone?
 * ✅ (removed from lead per condensation above + monetary estimates are all over the place so replaced with 70%-90% of the world jade supply).
 * "operators.[7]These" space after ref.
 * "in a moonscape-like scene devoid of trees" this is a bit POV, is it attributable to someone?
 * "in a moonscape-like scene devoid of trees" this is a bit POV, is it attributable to someone?

That's all I have on a first read. The Rambling Man (Keep wearing the mask...) 10:59, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * "[7][3]" order.
 * "mine.[5]In 2019, fifty workers were buried in a mine collapse, resulting in the deaths of 2 rescue workers and 4 " space after ref, and fifty/two/four.
 * "completing Environmental impact assessment and submitting Environmental management" no need to capitalise the E each time.
 * Landslide section has several short paras, could merge up a little to two paras.
 * "At 06:30 local time," what is the "local time" with respect to UTC?
 * "people.[10][2] As of" ref order.
 * "54 injured people" avoid starting sentences with numeral.
 * "landslide.[15][14] While" ref order.
 * "only 393 mm which is lower than the annual average of 475 mm suggesting" converts.
 * 2,500$ -> $2,500 and I assume that's US?
 * "greedy". Aung San Suu Kyi, then de-" overlinked.
 * "The BBC News in" no need for The.
 * Consistency for references, have accessdates/publications dates outside titles, include publishers outside titles etc.
 * In progress.... ✅, or at least improved quite a bit. The one inconsistency I was unable to resolve was the location of the publication date in some pieces. Cite News, as illustrated in Template:Cite news renders differently when there are named authors and when there is no named author (no byline, or byline of news agency), when there are authors it places the date after the last author. When there are no authors it places the date after the agency/work in the end.
 * Ref 6 The Gulf Times should be italics.
 * As should ref 11.
 * Compare ref 8 and 13 for al Jazeera format.
 * 2,500$ -> $2,500 and I assume that's US?
 * "greedy". Aung San Suu Kyi, then de-" overlinked.
 * "The BBC News in" no need for The.
 * Consistency for references, have accessdates/publications dates outside titles, include publishers outside titles etc.
 * In progress.... ✅, or at least improved quite a bit. The one inconsistency I was unable to resolve was the location of the publication date in some pieces. Cite News, as illustrated in Template:Cite news renders differently when there are named authors and when there is no named author (no byline, or byline of news agency), when there are authors it places the date after the last author. When there are no authors it places the date after the agency/work in the end.
 * Ref 6 The Gulf Times should be italics.
 * As should ref 11.
 * Compare ref 8 and 13 for al Jazeera format.
 * In progress.... ✅, or at least improved quite a bit. The one inconsistency I was unable to resolve was the location of the publication date in some pieces. Cite News, as illustrated in Template:Cite news renders differently when there are named authors and when there is no named author (no byline, or byline of news agency), when there are authors it places the date after the last author. When there are no authors it places the date after the agency/work in the end.
 * Ref 6 The Gulf Times should be italics.
 * As should ref 11.
 * Compare ref 8 and 13 for al Jazeera format.
 * Compare ref 8 and 13 for al Jazeera format.
 * Compare ref 8 and 13 for al Jazeera format.
 * Mostly done, still working on the citations (saving page because I'm afraid my citation bot and citation tool tinkering might crash this browser session).-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 13:03, 31 August 2021 (UTC)
 * can you take a second look? I think I've addressed most, if not all, of your concerns above.-- Eostrix  (&#x1F989; hoot hoot&#x1F989;) 13:55, 31 August 2021 (UTC)