Talk:2020 Missouri Amendment 2/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Onegreatjoke (talk · contribs) 01:34, 28 May 2023 (UTC)

Hello. I will be reviewing this article to see if it can attain GA status. Comments should (hopefully) start coming tomorrow or the day after tomorrow. Onegreatjoke (talk) 01:34, 28 May 2023 (UTC)


 * If you're up for it, I'm open to any criticism here. Feel free to add any non-GA comments (especially regarding what I wrote on this article's talk page about, not sure how relevant those are). I probably won't take this to FA, but I would like to see the issues which would hinder any future FA push by me. ~ UN6892  tc 14:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * Alright, I'm finally done. Putting this on hold to combat the one issue I had with the citation. Onegreatjoke (talk) 21:40, 13 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Alright, article looks good so approving. Onegreatjoke (talk) 15:17, 14 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Pass/fail:

Prose
Background Campaign
 * "The initiative was on the August 4, 2020 primary ballot and passed with 53.27% of the vote." Comma after 2020
 * " Republican lawmakers added work requirements to Medicaid expansions, which supporters aimed to prevent through proposing state constitutional amendments for future Medicaid expansions." Should probably say "by" instead of "through"
 * "that it would be unconstitutional to remove funding from states which did not wish to opt in." Should be a dash between opt and in.
 * "despite them not being elgible for Medicaid." Should be eligible.

That seems to be all for prose. Onegreatjoke (talk) 23:49, 1 June 2023 (UTC)


 * All ✅ ~ UN6892  tc 00:36, 2 June 2023 (UTC)

Spotchecks

 * [3] is good
 * [7] is good
 * [8] is good
 * while [9] is good, "No on 2 in August campaigned against the initiative." isn't cited by source 9
 * [1] is ggood
 * [11] is good
 * [14] is good
 * [15] is good


 * I put source 5 at the end of the sentence. All issues should be addressed. ~ UN6892  tc 22:32, 13 June 2023 (UTC)