Talk:2020 Treviso Open/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 18:49, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

I'll be taking a look at this! —  Ghost River  18:49, 23 September 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lede

 * Comma after "The event had a total prize pool of €38,000"
 * Comma after "The men's event was won by Jayson Shaw"
 * Switch the first two sentences of the second paragraph for better flow (e.g. defending champion eliminated new winner)
 * Done Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Tournament format

 * Why is the name of the hotel italicized here?
 * Specify in this section that it's nine-ball pool, which is mentioned in the lede but not in the body
 * Not a fan of the semi-colon after "double-elimination tournament", as the second half is not actually an independent clause.
 * Move "7–5" to after "Marharyta Fefilava" rather than at the end of the sentence, for better clarity
 * Done Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Prize fund

 * "both of the winners of the event" "the winner of each event"; otherwise it could be read that there were two winners per event
 * Done Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:13, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Tournament summary

 * Is it "losers round" or "loser's round"? Both are used at different points
 * Comma after "Oliwia Zalewska"
 * Remove comma after "completed two 7–6 victories"
 * "defeated" used twice in the sentence beginning "Having defeated Bojana Sarac" and is used again in the next sentence. Should use a synonym to break up flow
 * Per MOS:CAPTION, since it's a complete sentence, the caption should end with a period
 * No comma needed after "Ouschan won the final"
 * Hyphen to en dash in the last sentence
 * all done Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

Results

 * Why is one a "competition" and the other is an "event"?
 * fixed. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:24, 24 September 2021 (UTC)

General comments

 * No stability concerns within the revision history
 * One photo, relevant and properly licensed
 * Per MOS:IMAGELOCATION, the photo used should probably be on the right side
 * I was working on It is often preferable to place images of people so that they "look" toward the text, but do not achieve this by reversing the image, which creates a false presentation, which is why it's on the left, but I can't say I care either way. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:26, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Earwig score looks great at 2.9%

That's all I have! Ping me if you have any questions. —  Ghost River  19:01, 23 September 2021 (UTC)
 * All done . Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 10:31, 24 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks good to me, thanks! —  Ghost River  13:42, 24 September 2021 (UTC)