Talk:2020 in LGBT rights

Article Evaluation
Everything in the article was relevant to the topic. The article has a neutral, objective tone. The main issue is that there is little information on the events listed. I would suggest adding more specific information from the sources. For example, one piece of information that could be added is that the New Hampshire bill was passed in 2019 but did not go into effect until 2020. Adding information on what each of these laws entail would also be a good idea. It's unclear what the "1" and the "13" in the article represent. The sources were well cited.

ElliottBW (talk) 03:34, 25 January 2020 (UTC)

everything in this article was relevant and sited well. it could use a bit more detail about each of the developments in 2020 relating to LGBTQ+ rights, although I understand that 2020 just started and there may be very few developments as of currently. Another thing I would consider is changing the title to include the Q+ part of the LGBTQ+ community. The article is very neutral and shows very little bias due to the little detail provided. the links all work which shows that you've sited your references well. All in all this article is well put together, the only recommendations i have are listed above.--Kkatereid (talk) 06:13, 26 January 2020 (UTC)