Talk:2021–2022 Columbia University strike/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: GhostRiver (talk · contribs) 21:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

I will be reviewing this within the next couple of days! —  Ghost River  21:18, 13 September 2021 (UTC)

Infobox and lede

 * Specify in the first sentence that it was a labor strike among graduate students at Columbia
 * Done.
 * "disagreements between the two entities has" "disagreements between the two entities have"
 * Done.
 * "Additional issues included" the rest of the paragraph is in present tense; have these additional issues been resolved?
 * Rephrased to present tense.

Unionization at Columbia

 * WL first instance of labor union in the body
 * Done.

Contract negotiations

 * Delink teaching assistants, already linked above
 * Done.
 * "a one year extension for PhD students" "a one-year funding extension for doctoral candidates whose research had been interrupted by pandemic shutdowns" (I know there is a difference between simple doctoral and PhD, but this has been the crux of the issue in a lot of higher ed COVID disputes, and I believe it is supported by the source)
 * Done.
 * Delink coffee and doughnuts per MOS:OVERLINK
 * Done.

Course of the strike

 * "including the class of 2024 class president" "including the president of the Class of 2024"
 * Done.
 * "the Spectator was claiming that" "the Spectator reported that" per MOS:DOUBT
 * Done.
 * "an op-ed in Technician" "an op-ed in the Technician" (I know it's technically incorrect, but it flows better)
 * Done.
 * "the 7 bargaining unit members" "the seven bargaining unit members" per MOS:NUMBERS
 * Done.
 * "The remaining 3 members" "The remaining three members" per [{MOS:NUMBERS]]
 * Done.

Aftermath

 * Good

General comments

 * All photos are properly licensed and are relevant to the article
 * No stability concerns present in the revision history
 * Earwig score looks good at 22.5%, the highest due to an attributed direct quote

Putting on hold to address comments, all minor things. Ping me if there are any questions. —  Ghost River  12:40, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * , just pinging to let you know that I've made some changes to the article to address your comments here. Thanks again for starting this review, and if there are any further questions, comments, or concerns, please reach out. -JJonahJackalope (talk) 12:49, 14 September 2021 (UTC)
 * Looks all good now, happy to pass! —  Ghost River  13:05, 14 September 2021 (UTC)