Talk:2021 French Grand Prix/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Lee Vilenski (talk · contribs) 11:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Hello, I am planning on reviewing this article for GA Status, over the next couple of days. Thank you for nominating the article for GA status. I hope I will learn some new information, and that my feedback is helpful.

If nominators or editors could refrain from updating the particular section that I am updating until it is complete, I would appreciate it to remove a edit conflict. Please address concerns in the section that has been completed above (If I've raised concerns up to references, feel free to comment on things like the lede.)

I generally provide an overview of things I read through the article on a first glance. Then do a thorough sweep of the article after the feedback is addressed. After this, I will present the pass/failure. I may use strikethrough tags when concerns are met. Even if something is obvious why my concern is met, please leave a message as courtesy.

Best of luck! you can also use the ✅ tag to state when something is addressed.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)

Please let me know after the review is done, if you were happy with the review! Obviously this is regarding the article's quality, however, I want to be happy and civil to all, so let me know if I have done a good job, regardless of the article's outcome.

Lede

 * Not much here that i can critique... but why is the fastest lap not mentioned?  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Also, could do with a mention of the length of the event.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:03, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

General

 * Some spectators cancelled their bookings following the date change; the organisers re-sold returned tickets - is this actually relevant?  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * A lap at the recently resurfaced circuit measures 5.842 kilometres - measures. Whilst I'm sure it's still true, we don't want to have to go back and change it when it changes.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Sole Formula One tyre supplier Pirelli - whilst I realise that there is historical reasons to say sole, we don't need to say that in this article. "The Formula..." would be fine.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * wings of cars - pipes to a redirect.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * hit a wall - maybe "made contact", "hit a wall" has some other meanings.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm a bit suprised there isn't a dedicated article to the current Alfa Romeo F1 team.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I know the bolding is for the fastest time, but we need to spell that out due to WP:ACCESS.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I've said this before, (and maybe it's worth a bigger chat), but I'm not a fan with the prose and statistic tables being intertwined.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Why is the whole of the points list in bold?  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * Championship standings after the race needs some prose.  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:12, 13 June 2022 (UTC)

Review meta comments

 * I'll begin the review as soon as I can! If you fancy returning the favour, I have a list of nominations for review at WP:GAN and WP:FAC, respectively. I'd be very grateful if you were to complete one of these if you get time. Best Wishes,  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs)  Lee Vilenski  (talk • contribs) 11:41, 13 June 2022 (UTC)
 * I'm happy to support the nomination (and will pass now). I've pretty much given you a FAC review above, which is where the article should probably go. I trust that you'll make the neccesary changes I've outlined before taking it to that forum. Great article, fantastic work  Lee Vilenski (talk • contribs) 12:13, 13 June 2022 (UTC)