Talk:2022 Fenway Bowl/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Cherrell410 (talk · contribs) 20:03, 19 June 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not)


 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * see bottom
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * All of the names in this article need to be wikilinked per MOS:UL
 * Do you mean the names of the individual players? If so, then I disagree; I don't think the linked MOS page supports that (they'd all be redlinks and, while that's not necessarily a bad thing, I'm not convinced they'd all be notable enough to be turned blue). If there's any football-specific terms that need linking, let me know and I can do that (that falls under the "jergon/technical terms" clause of UL). PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Any names that are bluelinks should be linked. Cherrell410 (talk) 02:27, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Done, added three links. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Sorry, forgot a ping. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 02:45, 22 June 2023 (UTC)
 * "deadlocked" should be wikilinked
 * Changed this to another word that more clearly describes what happened. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * c. (OR):
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * 8.7%!!!
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * b. (focused):
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * No media, but media are not required for GA status
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * per above
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Suggestions for improvements:
 * Lead: The inaugural fenway bowl, the game featured... --> As the inaugural fenway bowl, the game featured...
 * Adjusted, but used different wording. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Background: unable to play their scheduled opponent, smu, was unable to find a replacement --> sentence should be split into 2
 * I disagree; the second part of that sentence explains that SMU wasn't able to replace UVA after they had to drop out. I think it sounds totally natural as is, with only one sentence. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Teams#Cincinnati: set to join --> joined
 * I know this seems pedantic, but Cincinnati won't join the Big 12 until next Saturday, July 1, 2023, so changing it to past tense now would technically be incorrect. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * No media, but media are not required for GA status
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * per above
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Suggestions for improvements:
 * Lead: The inaugural fenway bowl, the game featured... --> As the inaugural fenway bowl, the game featured...
 * Adjusted, but used different wording. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Background: unable to play their scheduled opponent, smu, was unable to find a replacement --> sentence should be split into 2
 * I disagree; the second part of that sentence explains that SMU wasn't able to replace UVA after they had to drop out. I think it sounds totally natural as is, with only one sentence. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Teams#Cincinnati: set to join --> joined
 * I know this seems pedantic, but Cincinnati won't join the Big 12 until next Saturday, July 1, 2023, so changing it to past tense now would technically be incorrect. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Adjusted, but used different wording. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Background: unable to play their scheduled opponent, smu, was unable to find a replacement --> sentence should be split into 2
 * I disagree; the second part of that sentence explains that SMU wasn't able to replace UVA after they had to drop out. I think it sounds totally natural as is, with only one sentence. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)
 * Teams#Cincinnati: set to join --> joined
 * I know this seems pedantic, but Cincinnati won't join the Big 12 until next Saturday, July 1, 2023, so changing it to past tense now would technically be incorrect. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:36, 21 June 2023 (UTC)

(Criteria marked are unassessed)


 * responses above, thank you for the review. PCN02WPS  ( talk  &#124;  contribs ) 21:37, 21 June 2023 (UTC)