Talk:2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election

Speculations cannot be added on Wikipedia
@GJ 06 You have re-added the speculatory content that I had removed. Now I see @YttriumShrew has removed it again. Please follow WP:V. We cannot add anything based on speculations. Any content that is without a reliable source can be challenged and removed. It should not be restored without backing up with a reliable source. If you think that the reliable source may be available in future, then you should wait for that time and only add it back with the reliable source. Continued addition of unsourced and specualatory content is considered disruptive. Same goes for empty tables. Venkat TL (talk) 07:56, 17 November 2021 (UTC)


 * The alliance mentioned between NCP and INC is also a purely speculative one, furthermore they did not ally with each other in 2017 & fought the 2021 local elections separately, yet they are mentioned to be within UPA. In contrast BTP & AIMIM fought the 2021 local elections together and have declared their intention to fight the assembly polls together.
 * source https://www.aninews.in/news/national/general-news/aimim-to-fight-next-assembly-polls-in-gujarat-in-alliance-with-bharatiya-tribal-party20201226205408 GJ 06 (talk) 09:51, 17 November 2021 (UTC)
 * GJ 06, this is acceptable as it is sourced. But Congress NCP Gujarat alliance need to be sourced separately. Please do not revert back unsourced stuff. Thank you. --Venkat TL (talk) 10:59, 17 November 2021 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for deletion: Participate in the deletion discussion at the. —Community Tech bot (talk) 06:21, 19 June 2022 (UTC)
 * જગદીશ ઠાકુર.png

AAP
@Joe de Jointe you need to check 2021 Gujarat local elections. It is third largest party in 2021 Gujarat local elections based on vote share and number of seats. AAP alliance has 2 seats in the Assembly, and most importantly media coverage of this party is on par with BJP or Congress. Please discuss your objections on the talk page. Venkat TL (talk) 09:38, 7 August 2022 (UTC)


 * @Chennai Super Kings Lover please discuss your edit. Venkat TL (talk) 06:15, 19 August 2022 (UTC)
 * @Chennai Super Kings Lover, @Ok123l There is no such 5% rule. Reliable sources are giving AAP prime coverage alogn with BJP and Congress. AAP has substantial presence in local bodies. See above comments. Please do not remove this without consensus. Venkat TL (talk) 16:49, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Then why in Punjab Assembly election NDA alliance was not shown because it has less than 5% votes according to your prediction but infact BJP has got more seats Het666 (talk) 09:14, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 Due to media coverage. See WP:Reliable source Venkat TL (talk) 11:50, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

What sources are you talking about? Het666 (talk) 11:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * You can pick up any reliable source about 2022 Guj Election. Example : and  Venkat TL (talk) 17:39, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Last revert AAP in infobox
Can you please enlighten me as to how rearranging the infobox the conventional way based on the number of votes and seats that parties gathered in previous elections is non-constructive? TheWikiholic (talk) 02:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Special:Diff/1115634371/1115702415, Special:Diff/1116064204 removing content from Infobox and Edit warring against talk page consensus. Venkat TL (talk) 07:17, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * There isn't any consensus on this talk page or anywhere else. And FYI we don't use the voting percentage or number of seats of local elections on Wikipedia pages of state elections or general elections. TheWikiholic (talk) 12:23, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please point me to the rule that you are following. As far as I am aware Wikipedia articles are written on what Reliable sources say. Not speculations by Editors. Venkat TL (talk) 17:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I never cited any rules here. I was talking about a common practice that has been followed and maintained by the community over the years. If you have any doubt you can verify that by checking the categories of different elections of the legislative assembly. An infobox is not a place to project the speculation of either editors or the media. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Clearly you must have misunderstood the practice. The only rule is to follow and publish what the reliable source say. Not what you believe. No media source is calling BTP as a contender to win the election. Venkat TL (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

,, Do we have any policy that allows the info box to project speculations based on media reports? The Wikipedia infobox related to Indian elections has been arranged based on either the number of seats or the percentage of votes that a party got in their previous election. However, Venkat TL has been inserting AAP into the infobox of this page and this page even though APP has never won any single seat or a minimum of 1 percent vote in the 2017 previous Gujarat election. Parties like BTP and NCP also got more votes and seats in the previous election than AAP in the previous elections. Even though  I told him infobox is not a place to project the speculation of either editors or the media, and that these kinds of projections can be added to the section opinion poll, he kept insisting on restoring the edits of multiple editors. What are your thoughts on this?— TheWikiholic (talk) 01:46, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Is this a dispute about whether the AAP is listed alongside the other two parties in the infobox? Because if so, that is indeed based on whether reliable sources treat it as a serious contender for seats. I have no opinion on whether that is in fact the case here. Vanamonde (Talk) 03:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

What media houses are saying saying shall not be considered but last result and position of that party in current assembly shall be considered not speculation by media BTP shall be in infobox or keep only two alliance NDA and UPA Het666 (talk) 03:57, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Without consensus so many sourced information removed Het666 (talk) 09:48, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Vanamonde93 is right in his comment, "that is indeed based on whether reliable sources treat it as a serious contender for seats." You can pick up any reliable source about 2022 Guj Election And it will discuss AAP as a contender in this election along with BJP and Congress. Example : and  None of the reliable source claim that NCP or BTP is a serious contender for winning the election. TheWikiholic is making up his own rules and trying to enforce them on this page. When I challenged him to point me to the rules, he then made hand waves claiming them as practice and has now canvassed editors to this discussion thread. Venkat TL (talk) 10:18, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * If reliable sources cover AAP as a major contender in the elections, then it is ok to include them in the infobox, even if they finally end up with their previous 0.1% of the vote and 0 seats. Weight, on wikipedia, comes from reliable sources. --RegentsPark (comment) 22:44, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Content removed without giving reason
@Ok123l I have reverted your unexplained removal of sourced content while adding new content. Please don't remove existing content while you add new ones. Follow chronology while adding new content and do not copy paste. Venkat TL (talk) 10:48, 5 September 2022 (UTC)

Dont use Twitter as a source on Wikipedia
User:Ok123l I have Remove twitter links used as source that you had added. Twitter is not a reliable source. If no reliable source reported this info, then it is not important enough and this does not belong on Wikipedia. Also note that WP:TOI is not reliable Venkat TL (talk) 14:05, 6 September 2022 (UTC)


 * What better source can you get about Congress' promises than Congress itself? Ok123l (talk) 17:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * Godi media wont cover stuff, thats the media's problem Ok123l (talk) 17:24, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ok123l Wikipedia prefers Secondary and tertiary source instead of primary sources. Read WP:PSTS to understand what it means and why. Twitter is not considered reliable at all. Please do not restore twitter as source. I agree that Godi media cannot be used as source, but there are non godi media sources too. You can use more reliable sources, like NYT, BBC, NDTV, TheHindu Indian Express etc. If it is notable, they will cover it. Venkat TL (talk) 17:34, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Order of Sections
@Dhruv edits, we should follow the order of sections as given on MOS:INDELECT. The issues section and campaign section will have some overlap and should be together. The Manifesto section should be before Campaign section. This is the standard in other international election articles too. What is the reason for putting manifesto, in between issues and campaigns? Venkat TL (talk) 14:40, 6 September 2022 (UTC)

Congress copied AAP promises
Aam Aadmi Party announed Mohalla clinics for Gujarat along the lines of those it built in Delhi, Congress copied the promise and announced to open 'Janata Dawakhana' (Public pharmacy).

Ok123l what is your objection with this line, it is reliably sourced. Where do you think it should be mentioned if not in Manifesto section? Venkat TL (talk) 14:57, 6 September 2022 (UTC)


 * Maybe add a subheading controversies on manifesto Ok123l (talk) 16:45, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * I mean, Mohalla clinics offer basic health facilities in a community, India has probably has such things in the past before the AAP introduced it. Ok123l (talk) 16:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ok123l I am not going to discuss benefits of Mohalla clinic on this thread, suffice to say that Reliable source say it has received international acclaim. Creating a controversy section for one line is an overkill. Since it is about manifesto, it is in the intro of manifesto section. another option is to include it in Congress manifesto section. I am ok for both. Venkat TL (talk) 17:46, 6 September 2022 (UTC)


 * @Venkat TL It is looking very out of place in intro of the section. Should be included under Congress subsection. Dhruv edits (talk) 15:17, 8 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Dhruv edits ok. I am fine with the move. Venkat TL (talk) 09:43, 9 September 2022 (UTC)

Translated this article to Hindi
I've translated this article to Hindi, check it out: Translated this article to Hindi, check it out. If you're interested, please help me improve the page. Ok123l (talk) 17:33, 10 September 2022 (UTC)


 * https://hi.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2022_%E0%A4%97%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%9C%E0%A4%B0%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A4_%E0%A4%B5%E0%A4%BF%E0%A4%A7%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%A8_%E0%A4%B8%E0%A4%AD%E0%A4%BE_%E0%A4%9A%E0%A5%81%E0%A4%A8%E0%A4%BE%E0%A4%B5 Ok123l (talk) 03:08, 11 September 2022 (UTC)

Translated article to Gujarati
I've translated this article to Gujarati: https://gu.wikipedia.org/wiki/%E0%AA%97%E0%AB%81%E0%AA%9C%E0%AA%B0%E0%AA%BE%E0%AA%A4_%E0%AA%B5%E0%AA%BF%E0%AA%A7%E0%AA%BE%E0%AA%A8%E0%AA%B8%E0%AA%AD%E0%AA%BE_%E0%AA%9A%E0%AB%82%E0%AA%82%E0%AA%9F%E0%AA%A3%E0%AB%80,_%E0%AB%A8%E0%AB%A6%E0%AB%A8%E0%AB%A8 Ok123l (talk) 05:21, 11 September 2022 (UTC)


 * No. It was only expanded with machine translation. Please don't add translation unless you are fluent with the Gujarati language. -- Kartik Mistry talk 06:00, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

Gautam Adani
Why Gautam Adani is being referred as Narendra Modi ally sourced through a Jeff Bezos owned media ? Mundra port was developed by Adani during Congress rule in Gujarat, Adani has also been involved with Congress governments like in Maharashtra MVA and Gehlot led Rajasthan government's solar projects, and even the Hansdeo forest coal projects under the Congress led government in Chhattisgarh? Even the communists in Kerala have given some projects to Adani. How does the RNDTV takeover indicates that Gautam Adani is "Narendra Modi ally" ? सत्यान्वेषी (talk) 04:01, 13 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I will not debate Washington Post's authenticity as it is widely known for publishing factual news (See WP:RS/P). It is very clear that Adani is very close aide of Modi as his government has been waiving off gigantic loans of Adani. Now even if Adani got Mundra port during Congress, today they are a Modi ally. In the Washington Post's article, they didn't link NDTV takeover to Adani. They basically just said he is already a Modi ally and he is taking over an independent news channel. And what if Washington Post is owned by Jeff Bezos? Is he putting fake news in it? No. So that's a useless claim. If the Washington Post isn't enough, TheGuardian and DW News. Ok123l (talk) 05:03, 13 September 2022 (UTC)

If waiving loans makes Adani an ally of Modiji then what about the cheap land made available to Adani by the Congress governments of Gujarat ? Also the frustration of Congress workers is clear as they are losing control over all the institutions and governments and will be routed soon in Gujarat too, people know it better, and for the part of RNDTV, the meltdown in Gujarat results will be a pleasing sight of a landslide victory of BJP, and about China lover Washshitton post, its love for communists is not hidden, Thanks सत्यान्वेषी (talk) 05:20, 13 September 2022 (UTC)


 * I'm not trying to debate whether BJP will win or not but the fact that Adani is an ally of PM Modi is widely known and properly sourced by a reliable news source so it's not a baseless claim. Period. Ok123l (talk) 06:21, 13 September 2022 (UTC)
 * @Ok123l One IP user has removed this again. I suggest it should be added into the article. Venkat TL (talk) 13:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Venkat TL I re-added it. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Thank you @Dhruv edits @Venkat TL Ok123l (talk) 14:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)

I don't why Gautam Adani is shown as Narendra Modi's ally nor he is affiliated with any of the political party how can he be ally of a political leader nor he is only working for Narendra Modi Het666 (talk) 09:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It is based on reliable source and relevant to this page. See above. Venkat TL (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

The article referenced is about Advani's acquisition of ndtv media then how can it be related to Gujarat Het666 (talk) 10:35, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Are all sourced data relevant to any topic Don't put any information which has no link to 2022 Gujarat Assembly election Het666 (talk) 10:37, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Opinion poll survey
Opinion poll survey is added and somebody reverted without any reason. OPiniion polls and surveys are included in various related wiki pages see below for reference.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2017_Uttar_Pradesh_Legislative_Assembly_election#Opinion_polls — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gidua (talk • contribs) 05:52, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * can somebody create an infobox for the same @Bishonen Gidua (talk) 05:57, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Huh..? The article has an infobox. But I looked, and,, do you realize that your latest revert restored the IP's edit also, i.e. you restored their removal of a good reference? That seems like a seriously bad idea. Altogether, you shouldn't be edit warring over your insertion, but first wait for possible consensus for it here in this discussion you've opened. Bishonen &#124; tålk 08:06, 4 October 2022 (UTC).
 * thanx for adding the infobox Gidua (talk) 10:03, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * There is no consnsus to add the survey opinion poll data. Please refer to the Wikipedia:WikiProject Indian politics/Election: Article structure. Only reputed polling agencies who are transparent and released their sample size error % data can be added. The error percentage is not a range but a number. That itself is a sign that this is another fraud poll by C Voter. C Voter has been accused by all parties of being biased for a particular party, moreover C Voter has not released their sample size or error % so they should not be added. CVoter has been established to have conducted fraud polls see The Fraud Called Opinion Polls. All political parties and the Election Commission of India have called these opinion polls as fraudulent. Wikipedia should not be used to promote these paid news and fraud polls. In any case Please do not restore this section without a clear consensus. If internationally reputed polling agencies (e.g. Nielson) conduct polls and release data they can be suggested to be added. CVoter is neither trusted nor reputed, in fact they have a history of being caught manipulating. Please do not add it again. See WP:ONUS. Venkat TL (talk) 12:40, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Political parties in India always blame opinion polls if the result of the poll are not in there favor. So the reliability of opinion polls are an invalid argument. @Venkat TL keep ranting about C Voter is a fraud and paid poll without giving any credible evidence. It seems only @Venkat TL is not in agreement with this addition Gidua (talk) 14:26, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Gidua Look it is not me who is ranting. ALL political parties except one have called out these Opinion polls fraudulent. Let alone parties, Even the Constitutional Body, Election Commission of India have called it as fraudulent and asked for ban on it. See below.
 * Election Commission of India (ECI)
 * There is no consensus to add the controversial and fraudulent polls. Please dont misrepresent consensus. Venkat TL (talk) 15:28, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * It was all hunky and dory until the same pollster predicted an AAP sweep in Punjab and Delhi. It was neither controversial nor fraudulent.
 * I barely saw any section highlighting BJP's campaign or Manifesto, until now. I added a section detailing BJP's campaign today, and suddenly the page is semi-protected.
 * I think its time Wikipedia comes out of the garb of being neutral and shows what it truly represents. Iamashu95 (talk) 16:54, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I was about to give the same arguement. @EvergreenFir didnt even bother to give a look at the arguements given in the talk before reverting. C Voter was used as relible source untill today. But now today it is unreliable ? As an admin @EvergreenFir need to make sure that its reliability shall be discussed at appropriate forum which is WP RSN. This is not expected from an admin Gidua (talk) 17:08, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Stopping disruption is an admin's job. Edit warring is disruptive. If consensus forms on the talk page to add that content, then it will be added.  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:10, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Pinging  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:11, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I can understand that you have stopped the disruption by protecting the page for 2 days., and thats OK. But you have reverted an edit which is centre of dispute is questionable. Gidua (talk) 17:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * C Voter has been used as RS multiple times. But i can understand that any body can question its reliability at any time. But the appropriate place to raise a dispute regarding its reliability is WPRSN, as an admin you have to act neutrally by pointing @Venkat TL towards a right course of action . But you have failed in thatGidua (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Pinging  Eve rgr een Fir  (talk) 17:11, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I can understand that you have stopped the disruption by protecting the page for 2 days., and thats OK. But you have reverted an edit which is centre of dispute is questionable. Gidua (talk) 17:35, 4 October 2022 (UTC)
 * C Voter has been used as RS multiple times. But i can understand that any body can question its reliability at any time. But the appropriate place to raise a dispute regarding its reliability is WPRSN, as an admin you have to act neutrally by pointing @Venkat TL towards a right course of action . But you have failed in thatGidua (talk) 17:39, 4 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Since Evvie pinged me in the hatted section above, I'll mention that I was just writing up a sharp warning to Gidua about their varied disruption at this article. But I see they have now been indeffed as a sock by a checkuser. Bishonen &#124; tålk 18:07, 4 October 2022 (UTC).

Opinion polls
Why opinion polls are not added to this page? Like recently ABP made a poll with almost 60000+ people. That should be added. 106.77.79.170 (talk) 18:41, 5 October 2022 (UTC)


 * because Election Commission of India (ECI) says that they are fake polls. . Venkat TL (talk) 14:26, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Venkat TL To be fair, they did not mention C-Voter specifically. Ok123l (talk) 12:03, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Who do you think they are talking about? This particular incident about CVoter was all over the news. Others are also doing the same. Venkat TL (talk) 16:48, 7 October 2022 (UTC)
 * One more Opinion poll. Should be added? by Republic TV-P-Marq.- Nizil (talk) 04:17, 16 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Nizil Republic TV is deprecated source because of many instances of fabrication and fake news. Should not be added. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:13, 16 November 2022 (UTC)

BTP
BTP should be shown as third party not AAP because it has got more votes percentage than AAP Het666 (talk) 09:16, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Wrong. The results of 2022 have not been declared yet. Venkat TL (talk) 09:33, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Based upon last page on 2017 Gujarat Legislative Assembly Election only two party is shown AAP is not even shown in that list Het666 (talk) 09:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * This is not 2017 election article. This is 2022 article. AAP is among the top three parties in 2022 Gujarat election. See the section above for more. Venkat TL (talk) 10:12, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

So AAP shall not be considered as third party BTP has 2 MLAs in Gujarat election and has significant impact on Tribal areas of Gujarat so added and basis on municipal election results is irrelevant too Het666 (talk) 10:29, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 The article has excessive numbers of sources calling AAP top 3 parties in Gujarat. Find me one source that says BTP is in top three today. Venkat TL (talk) 10:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Firstly give your sources Het666 (talk) 10:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Also no sources are saying about is getting significant voting percentage Het666 (talk) 10:45, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I think so many sources would also have said AAP will election too are election results declared And also during Punjab assembly election NDA alliance also not shown because it would get 5% or less votes Het666 (talk) 10:48, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * See the section above. Also read these references.  and  Venkat TL (talk) 11:05, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * The infobox is arranged based on the previous election results not on media reports/speculations or projections. If the media says AAP is the third biggest party it should be added to the section of opinion polls, not in infobox. TheWikiholic (talk) 12:30, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @TheWikiholic Please point me to the rule that you are following. As far as I am aware Wikipedia articles are written on what Reliable sources say. Not speculations by Editors. Venkat TL (talk) 17:38, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * I never cited any rules here. I was talking about a common practice that has been followed and maintained by the community over the years. If you have any doubt you can verify that by checking the categories of different elections of the legislative assembly. An infobox is not a place to project the speculation of either editors or the media. TheWikiholic (talk) 18:02, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Clearly you must have misunderstood the practice. The only rule is to follow and publish what the reliable source say. Not what you believe. No media source is calling BTP as a contender to win the election. Not sure from where you are getting such hints even. Venkat TL (talk) 18:07, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

Huh from this article it's just a Speculation and it has only references which has been made by Kejriwal ohimself how that can make third or second or single largest party ? Personal opinion of AAP is not considered nothing in that article is saying AAP is significant party in Gujarat election Het666 (talk) 11:41, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

And about municipal election results which don't have influence since it covers only Municipal Corporations Het666 (talk) 11:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

It is better that BTP which has two MLAs in Gujarat assembly shall be considered as party and mentioned in article Het666 (talk) 11:43, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 Please provide reliable source that says BTP is a serious contender for winning this election. you have not provided such a source. Your opinions are not reliable source. I do not support adding it. Since there is no consensus Please do not edit war to add it without getting WP:CONSENSUS, Please check WP:ONUS and WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION, if you continue to edit war this, you will be reported for edit warring. Venkat TL (talk) 10:29, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Nor i have reverted or edited about AAP and admin also has said the same about you nor i have made any disruptive editing not i m engaged in any war Het666 (talk) 13:49, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Just quuoying satatement of AAP doesn't mean a reliable source and I m not giving opinion it's based on past result of Election and from other election pages last time the same is done on Punjab Election too where you have said the same about minimum 5% vote criteria for party in inbox Het666 (talk) 13:56, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Het666 (talk) 14:07, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Het666 (talk) 14:10, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Het666, The second link you posted only mentions 3 party in Headline. AAP, Congress, BJP. There is no BTP in headline. Do you know why? --Venkat TL (talk) 14:13, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Second one is about AAP is not a third party three party doesn't mean third party btw Het666 (talk) 14:16, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Please indent your post. Here is the headline, . Clearly AAP is mentioned in headline and no BTP, why ? Because BTP is not a serious contendor of winning Gujarat election. Or else they would have mentioned BTP also in the headline. --Venkat TL (talk) 14:21, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Ok but are mentioning three parties compulsory look 2022 Himachal Legislative Assembly Election Het666 (talk) 14:36, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Mentioning the major contenders of the election according to reliable media is important. even in Himachal AAP is considered contender by Media. See . Venkat TL (talk) 17:02, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Jagmal Vala's remarks on Alcohol
AAP candidate has supported Alcohol in Gujarat therefor included because which is related to Alcohol issue. Het666 (talk) 09:53, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * What is the significance? is this party position? Most importantly you have added this 3 times and you have been reverted. It should be obvious to you that there is no consensus to add this and yet you keep edit warring to add this here? Venkat TL (talk) 10:10, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

I haven't get complaint about it and I have put that data because it is ralted to Alcohol issue Het666 (talk) 10:27, 15 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 when you add something and it gets removed. It is a complaint. you need to stop adding it and get consensus on the talk page. Venkat TL (talk) 10:42, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * If this then Same also apply to Narendra Modi's ally too Het666 (talk) 10:57, 15 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Issues section is related to problems about government, not opposition. Also there has already been consensus to add Narendra Modi's ally; check here. Ok123l (talk) 08:49, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Het666 also you can't just remove something then not start a section on the talk page about, say no consensus and hope everybody forgets it. Ok123l (talk) 08:54, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

It's not opposition it's contrary Het666 (talk) 09:35, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 I have asked some questions to understand why you believe it is important for this article. you have not answered. I have read the reference and the content and I do not support adding it. Since there is no consensus Please do not edit war to add it without getting WP:CONSENSUS, Please check WP:ONUS and WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION, if you continue to edit war this, you will be reported for edit warring. Venkat TL (talk) 10:28, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Status Quo version of 11 October restored
WP:STATUSQUO version by Cosmo Sarjak is restored for now. I have Reverted back to last consensus version that was acceptable to all, before recent controversial edits that were introduced without discussion and WP:CONSENSUS. Please follow WP:DISPUTE RESOLUTION and only make controversial edits after gaining consensus. Same applies to content removals. Regarding the full protection, this is an ongoing event and full protection is unworkable because the article gets frozen with no updates. This is a WP:controversial article and 'any user' who refuse to follow the WP:DISPUTERESOLUTION and WP:CONSENSUS policies to push their edits without consensus would need to follow the rules or should be blocked for editing warring without consensus. --Venkat TL (talk) 10:05, 16 October 2022 (UTC)


 * Your restoration is somewhat welcomed since there is no consensus yet. But you seem to have reverted many other edits which were updated, rightly sourced and had no disputes from any editor, including you, friend. And since I don't have thousands of edits like other editors here, I can't correct them once again till next year. Request you to add back things which had no dispute, were rightly sourced & are irrefutable. Thanks FofS&#38;E (talk) 16:45, 16 October 2022 (UTC)
 * FofS&#38;E I had to pick a version from past that is not my own, and before the addition of controversial content. In the next few edits, I have already added back most of the uncontroversial edits. Some of the edits that are controversial or were sourced to unreliable source like WP:TOI have not been restored. They would need better sources and consensus. If you think I missed some relevant noncontroversial content in the revert, then please reply below in new thread and we can restore it back with consensus. --Venkat TL (talk) 16:58, 16 October 2022 (UTC)

Thank you for replying. I understand you had to pick a version from the past. Could you restore this one:- https://en.m.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=2022_Gujarat_Legislative_Assembly_election&oldid=1116103431 It was the version which was last edited by me and you had restored the article to this version which included my edits backed by strong sources which were already cited. Btw, WP:TOI is very reliable, they still have guts to be critical of the government and TOI is not a deprecated source like Twitter or YouTube.

Yes, you missed some minor, yet relevant and non-controversial content which is why I came here. The last edit of 14th October where you had restored my version had no disputable content which resulted in this consensus talk. To the best of my knowledge. Request you to edit article back to that version, of course after checking and if you feel I'm right here.

Thanks!

FofS&#38;E (talk) 04:32, 17 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @FofS&E You may have your opinion on TOI, but please click and read WP:TOI. This is not up for debate that TOI is not reliable. Wikipedia community believes it is not reliable. You are free to read any newspaper you like, but you should not add it as a source on Wikipedia. Either find another more reliable source or dont add that content at all, if TOI is the only source. Venkat TL (talk) 18:38, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

I just read WP:TOI. The legend used is "!" which says it is neither generally reliable nor generally unreliable. i.e No Consensus. Anyways, I wasn't the one who cited that reliable source. Unemployment is 1.6% not 2.6%. Again, from the source which is cited and not added by me. FofS&#38;E (talk) 06:14, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

AAP candidates need to be updated
AAP candidates need to be updated in 2022_Gujarat_Legislative_Assembly_election. Source =

, please add. Venkat TL (talk) 11:02, 20 October 2022 (UTC)
 * done by --Venkat TL (talk) 19:26, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Campaign - Bhartiya Janata Party
i have just put data which is related to BJP campaign and in reference it is clearly said that it is for campaign Read Article carefully particularly first para Het666 (talk) 15:45, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 Don't add content from Op-ed articles. References has to be from proper news articles, not someone's opinions. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:15, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * How a simple phrase can Op-ed ?? It's not someone's opinion. Similarly other party has also did this does that also mean OP-ed. Its look like you misinterpreted between a phrase and Opinion Simply it just a phrase which reflects thier campaign not their opinion Het666 (talk) 16:31, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 It's not a reliable source. The article clearly states its an Opinion piece and not a news article. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:46, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * How can you call unreliable, where Wikipedia is allowing . Read Opinion piece which clearly states that when it is given by an author, it's is used as phrase in a party's campaign for election Het666 (talk) 16:55, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Given line is phrase used for campaigning not giving any opinion Het666 (talk) 16:58, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

You can't call any reference unreliable where it doesn't match your OPINION Het666 (talk) 16:59, 20 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 The whole article is the opinion of the author, as it is clearly tagged as 'Opinion' on the website. If it is the campaign slogan, you shouldn't find it hard to get a better source. If you can't find it, don't add it. Wikipedia articles are made on the basis of WP:V and WP:RS. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:10, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Yes it's a neutral source you can't deny it but it's a consensus matter therefor not reverted Het666 (talk) 17:18, 20 October 2022 (UTC)

Employment subsection
Unreliable primary sources are being used in the ‎Unemployment section without any attribution, to paint a rosy picture. The entire section needs to be re-written with better sources to represent ground realities. Venkat TL (talk) 07:47, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 answer here. Ok123l (talk) 09:07, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


 * I think data should be from CMIE better source and they are showing 1.6% so it's a rosy picture or not I don't know, any statements by political parties should not be considered Het666 (talk) 10:22, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

All the issues here mentioned political parties statements and allegations so understand reliability about that also Het666 (talk) 10:25, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

I think AAP leader's statement on BJP leader is not an issue instead it shall be in incident section also same with attack on AAP leader Het666 (talk) 10:41, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

I have slightly re-written the sub-section and removed content from unreliable and questionable sources. Only content from reliable sources has been included. Dhruv edits (talk) 20:43, 21 October 2022 (UTC) CMIE is a reliable source


 * Dear Dhruv, what is your objection to PLFS based info? What consensus is needed is needed for the fact that Gujarat is a prosperous state with low unemployment numbers, as proved by PLFS survey? Reva1804 (talk) 05:57, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Reva1804 I haven't raised any objection on the pdf because I haven't gone through it yet. The objection, as clearly explained to you on your talk page and edit summaries multiple times, was that you have removed properly sourced information three times without any consensus and proper reasoning, making them disruptive edits, as well as engaging in an edit war. And I see you still haven't added back the sourced information that you removed without consensus. Dhruv edits (talk) 06:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Looks like you want to remove the undisputed fact that Gujarat has low unemployment rate by reporting me for edit war/disruptive edits. Instead of reporting, you can add the info you want to add, without removing the first two lines. Reva1804 (talk) 06:23, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * If rate of Unemployment is low in Gujarat so not a poll issue then why are adding it CMIE is a reliable source Viewers should get reliable information not a political parties statements Het666 (talk) 13:36, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 because CMIE is not a reliable source. Figures of Gujarat government budget and registered unemployment agencies are official reliable sources. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:45, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * So provide us that data otherwise Economy of Gujarat data shall be considered Het666 (talk) 14:07, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 It is already in the article. Dhruv edits (talk) 14:18, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * ok fine, And that's is showing 3.3% lowest amongst the other states/uts Het666 (talk) 14:28, 24 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Ok123l Unemployment is steadily decreasing as per PLFS. Proof attached in ref


 * so many information is just allegations of parties not facts is added here then why decreasing unemployment can't be added, user:Dhruv edits is continuously making Disruptive editing satatements by political parties just for their politics not in reality  Het666 (talk) 11:58, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Het666 PLFS info was added twice. I removed the redundant information. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:07, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * again facts ignored, i m asking User:Dhruv edits that why decreasing unemployment shall not be added here parties are just making issue without knowing facts Het666 (talk) 12:19, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * facts of a party shall not be considered Het666 (talk) 12:20, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Het666 because 'decreasing unemployment' is not a fact. It is based on a survey, not official figures. Other citations are from Reliable sources and have official figures, not based on some survey. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:27, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

User:Reva1804 wants to add "steadily decreasing unemployment" just after "steadily increasing unemployment". These contradict pretty bad and one needs to be removed. Since Business standard is a secondary source, it is probably preferred. Ok123l (talk) 12:23, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

See this opposition is meant for opposing incumbent government whether BJP AAP or Congress  Het666 (talk) 12:24, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

See CMIE sources there you will get lowest unemployment rate User:Ok123l Het666 (talk) 12:36, 4 November 2022 (UTC) @Dhruv edits Why are you dismissing PLFS survey as controversial? Do you have any proof stating Gujarat –has higher unemployment than national average? If not, don't remove it

Controversial PLFS survey from primary source
@Reva1804 Achieve consensus on talk page before adding PLFS data. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:44, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * What is controversial in PLFS survey? Why can't you accept the fact that Gujarat is a prosperous state with low unemployment figures? Reva1804 (talk) 12:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Did you achieve any consensus for removing PLFS data? Who told you it is controversial? It is clear you are biased towards AAP Reva1804 (talk) 12:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @WP:RS clearly state otherwise. Adding surveys from primary sources do not change what reliable sources say. Unless you have information from reliable sources that are secondary and not based on surveys, this should not be added. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:50, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Figures of Indian government's Ministry of Statistics are official reliable sources. Reva1804 (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * It is controversial because ot is from Primary source, not unbiased secondary source. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * You are the only one who is mentioning AAP everytime there has been a discussion regarding unemployment rates. No one else is doing that. Dhruv edits (talk) 12:53, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * You are the one trying to erase from this page the undisputed fact that Gujarat has one of the lowest unemployment rates. Clearly you are jealous of the state Reva1804 (talk) 12:56, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Figures of Indian government's Ministry of Statistics are official reliable sources. Reva1804 (talk) 12:54, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * According to you, is Indian Express a unbiased secondary source? I have IE report stating that Gujarat has lower than national average unemployment Reva1804 (talk) 12:59, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Reva1804 The first page of the pdf clearly states that the unemployment rates are based on estimates. There is nothing official or reliable about estimates. If the IE report is just reporting PLFS data then it is not secondary source. Dhruv edits (talk) 13:01, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * All unemployment statistics are based on estimates, even the ones that you have added to prove high unemployment. So don't try to divert the topic Reva1804 (talk) 13:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * There is nothing official or reliable about Employment Exchange data also, if we go by your logic. There cannot be a fixed number of unemployed, everything is based on estimates. If you remove IE article data, then I will remove others as they are also as reliable as PLFS Reva1804 (talk) 13:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)
 * The figures quoted by Employment exchange are not exact, as it doesn't capture all unemployed persons. Should we remove it too? Why can't you digest the fact that Gujarat has very low unemployment? Reva1804 (talk) 13:13, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * see this page Economy of Gujarat unemployment is lowest in Gujarat and its fact not AAP's false claim Het666 (talk) 15:00, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Dhruv edits give reliable source which say Gujarat has higher unemployment Het666 (talk) 15:03, 4 November 2022 (UTC)


 * He won't give, he and Ok123l are clearly jealous of Gujarat's low unemployment numbers as compared to other states, hence they are making silly excuses to erase the information Reva1804 (talk) 15:10, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Or we shall refer the information in Economy of Gujarat Het666 (talk) 15:08, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

First of all, I'd never removed the part saying Gujarat has lower unemployment than national average. Second, please do not personally attack anyone as you have done repeatedly. Third, PLFS is a primary source, secondary sources are preferred on Wikipedia. Fourth, Reva1804, you have broken WP:3RR and reverted without consensus. Bishonen, I request your intervention. Ok123l (talk) 15:26, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Bishonen, two accounts (Dhruv and Ok123l) are reverting my edits which are based on official Govt. of India statistics, to portray wrong info about unemployment in Gujarat. I have already discussed on talk page for consensus

is reliable source than other, if you have reason that PLFS is not reliable then give Personal shall be avoided Het666 (talk) 15:46, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

Article size
Article is too large and overly detailed now. Please summarize and split where necessary. Long quotes and irrelevant details should be scrapped. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 07:57, 21 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Nizil Shah on what basis are you calling it large? I think the article is still start class and lacks a lot of major information. I suggest you to check, 2017 United Kingdom general election to see how a decent election article looks like. Venkat TL (talk) 08:00, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * According to WP:TOOBIG, it is well above 88kb in size and will expand further with results and all. There is plenty of irrelevant and trivial details. That is why I suggested trimming for better readability and content coverage. We should also consider that each and every news item do not belong here. -Nizil (talk) 14:13, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Nizil Shah only prose text is counted in that calculation. Please read again. you are counting tables and everything including wiki markup. remove that and then count again, Venkat TL (talk) 14:45, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * OK. Still a lot need trimming. I have done some trimming like repeat of manifesto etc. Full party names, titles, obvious words, etc can be trimmed for better readability and summary. Regards,- Nizil (talk) 15:09, 21 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Nizil Shah I have a script installed. it calculated. "Prose size (text only) "readable prose size": 14 kB (2389 words)". So this is not large by any stretch of imagination. Please take inspiration from UK article and help to expand this substantially using non biased sources. Venkat TL (talk) 15:11, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

How can you compare an another countries' general elections with state's legislative election !! In this article major information is based on a political parties allegations on another party whether it's BJP AAP or INC yes his concern is right but size is ok Het666 (talk) 10:31, 21 October 2022 (UTC)

Candidate lists
Currently at least 8 parties are contesting the election. Will we list candidates of all of these parties? Or only three parties; BJP/INC/AAP? If we add of all 8 parties, the table will be too large and unmanageable. Is there any other election page having candidate lists? So we can take a cue from it.- Nizil (talk) 06:17, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Nizil Shah look at Punjab, Only those parties that are covered by Reliable Media as a major contender for winning the election are being listed in the infobox and the candidate list. currently it is only 3. Many parties and independents will contest but their members will only be listed in the result section after they win the election. Other party candidates and independents can be listed in the individual constituency articles, in the 2022 table. Venkat TL (talk) 08:55, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * Ok. Got it. Only AAP/INC/BJP here.-Nizil (talk) 11:41, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Nizil Shah yes, that is the consensus currently, you can find the consensus discussion here on Venkat TL (talk) 16:51, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

In the 2022 Uttar Pradesh Legislative Assembly election AAP candidates are listed on the page, while in 2022 Punjab Legislative Assembly election NDA candidates are not listed, In the UP AAP was not main contender compare to NDA in Punjab. Mahesh Chhanga 78 (talk) 09:49, 22 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Mahesh Chhanga 78 We should not be discussing other pages and election here, but to answer your question, NDA was not a contender for winning Punjab. No reliable media covered NDA as having a chance to win Punjab election. If you have read any such reliable media source please share on the Punjab talk page and ping me from there. UP was discussed here Venkat TL (talk) 10:45, 22 October 2022 (UTC)
 * @Mahesh Chhanga 78 see my reply to Nizil above. Venkat TL (talk) 16:52, 22 October 2022 (UTC)

Table rearranging
I have made this edit just to reduce width of table that viewers will get easier Het666 (talk) 04:22, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Table rearranged is easier to view but difficult to shorten data, While ascending/descending numbers of voters and/or margin after results. Mahesh Chhanga 78 (talk) 05:07, 25 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 You have edited against the talk page consensus for this table. Please read the discussion above. I support reverting Het666 edits as they have made the table harder to read as query data is in rows and not in columns as is standard in Wikipedia tables. Venkat TL (talk) 06:51, 25 October 2022 (UTC)


 * see other election pages where same has been done even during Punjab Election i have done the same but no one douted Het666 (talk) 07:12, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

@Mahesh Chhanga 78 @Venkat TL I am reverting these edits for now since talk page consensus was reached for both Himachal Pradesh and Gujarat at Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election and Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election. @Het666 Please achieve consensus for these edits on the talk page before redoing these edits. Dhruv edits (talk) 15:00, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Consensus was based on sorting so no problem in this format too Het666 (talk) 15:28, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

In my edit Table is sortable and each constituency in right order I don't know why it reverted what about Het666 (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

See other election pages where same format used and it is most suitable where there are more than one party CCC Het666 (talk) 15:30, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

In your table Format district column make table with more width Het666 (talk) 15:34, 25 October 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 A change of tabular format was agreed from Gujarat and Himachal Pradesh elections onwards. The old format of candidates table doesn't allow sorting function, rendering a very useful part of the table futile. Under this new format, sorting function can be used on all columns. More width in this new format is not a problem at all. Dhruv edits (talk) 16:25, 25 October 2022 (UTC)

Schedule of Gujarat State Assembly Election 2022
The Gujarat State Assembly Election 2022 will be conducted in two phases i.e December 1, 2022 & December 5, 2022 and the counting will be done on December 8, 2022 115.247.198.50 (talk) 07:28, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Schedule has been added. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:12, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Latest revert
Hey User: Dhruv edits i m not edit warring it's on your side and information is not about government process it is related to election and it is bjp agenda Het666 (talk) 08:29, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 Until BJP declares it as election agenda by adding it to their manifesto, it should not be part of the election article. As of yet it is just one of many committees in the government. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:31, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Look at references it's clearly saying it's related to election if word manifesto is inappropriate then it's may be removed and also agenda Het666 (talk) 08:33, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

see references Het666 (talk) 08:40, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Again don't doLamest edit wars Het666 (talk) 08:41, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Het666 Your reference clearly says that Union minister has said that UCC has nothing to do with upcoming elections, exactly the point I have made. Unless and until it clearly becomes election issue, ot should not be added. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:45, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * hey don't misinterprete the words Gujarat government has decided ahead of elections and other party have reacted by saying why ruling party is not implementing in whole india Het666 (talk) 08:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666. I have not misinterpreted any words. It has been clearly mentioned in the citation by BJP Union Minister that it is not a election issue. Until it becomes one, it will not be added. This is your last warning regarding WP:EDITWARRING . If you revert edits while talk page discussion is going on, you will be reported and blocked from editing. Dhruv edits (talk) 08:53, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Hey Edit warring applies to you and by reverting proper information is violation of any Wikipedia rule and it's you are doing at this time not me  Het666 (talk) 08:57, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * and about union cabinet minister reference, opposition parties considering as poll matter See other references where Arvind Kejriwal and Congress party saying this Het666 (talk) 09:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 Information on wikipedia can be added only when there is consensus for it. Unless consensus has been reached on talk page for adding it, it will not be added. Your attempts to revert back to your preferred version (which doesn't have consensus) is edit warring. Kindly take your time and read WP:EDIT WARRING. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:02, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

@Het666 Also adding 2 paragraphs and 7 refs for something that has very little to do with elections as of yet is clearly undue weight. I will try to summarise it in one sentence. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:09, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * again I'm saying I'm not edit warring it's you who is editing a well sourced proper information and without Consensus information shall not be removed them  Het666 (talk) 09:10, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * hey Wikipedia is not your own remember there are editors who are making good edits too Het666 (talk) 09:13, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Information is properly sourced and related too elections not personal opinions which you infact giving and this page is not having Consensus required btw Het666 (talk) 09:18, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

I have given proper explanation therefor information shall be added Het666 (talk) 09:19, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 Every sourced information is not added to articles. Kindly read WP:UNDUE and WP:CONSENSUS. I have also added one sentence regarding UCC. Dhruv edits (talk) 09:26, 3 November 2022 (UTC)

Don't give false arguments ofcourse, information i have put is Related to article read Consensus required and if your disagree doesn't mean information is invalid also I have given full explanation Het666 (talk) 09:30, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * @Het666 according to WP:ONUS you cannot revert the content back if anyone reverts it before consensus, so please don't. As for this content dispute I agree with Dhruv edits, the formation of a committee in Gujarat government is very minimally related to the Gujarat election. It's not officially part of the BJP manifesto and therefore should not be added. Please do not edit war. Ok123l (talk) 12:08, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * It's already been removed without consensus, however many political parties has reacted on BJP UCC committee User:Dhrub edits has himself added that into article he is removing information without Consensus Het666 (talk) 13:48, 3 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Traditionally things do not require a talk page discussion when it's just 1-2 sentences. When there's someone challenging it, that's when you need one. Even if political parties react, it doesn't change the fact that its just the formation of a committee. Ok123l (talk) 17:00, 3 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Support* I support addition of UCC Safoora Ham Burrger (talk) 17:50, 3 November 2022 (UTC) — Safoora Ham Burrger (talk&#32;• contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic. (WP:SOCKSTRIKE, previous SPA comment is not from me — DaxServer (t · m · c) 22:44, 7 November 2022 (UTC))

Het666, please do not falsely accuse others of vandalism or disruptive without proof that amounts to a personal attack. Ok123l (talk) 14:52, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

He has reverted edit done by me though I have given proper explanation he reverts again and again and also giving warring notice on my page is this Het666 (talk) 15:33, 4 November 2022 (UTC)

unless it is officially mentioned in the election manifesto by the political party...we cannot mention here in this election article. There are no sources that prove that it is a part of election manifesto officially now in this elections. 4 5 6 legend (talk) 13:03, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

India TV - Matrize Opinion poll for Gujarat
India TV - Matrize Opinion poll for Gujarat may be added in 2022 Gujarat Legislative Assembly election

Safoora Ham Burrger (talk) 05:55, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * According to the opinion poll, BJP may win a huge majority of 119 seats in the 182-member Gujarat assembly, while Congress may win 59 seats and Aam Aadmi Party may win only three seats. In 2017 assembly elections, BJP had won 99 seats, Congress had won 81 seats and ‘others’ had won two seats. Safoora Ham Burrger (talk) 05:57, 5 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Added. Ok123l (talk) 08:13, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * WP:SOCKSTRIKE — DaxServer (t · m · c) 22:41, 7 November 2022 (UTC)

Congress candidates
@Ok123l I have fixed the table structure. Just remove the Congress candidates appearing under AAP column and add them to Congress column. You can also add AAP's ninth and tenth list of candidates. Dhruv edits (talk) 15:20, 5 November 2022 (UTC)


 * I can't quite figure out how to remove Congress candidates appearing under AAP column and adding them to Congress column without the table breaking, but I will add AAP's ninth and tenth list. Ok123l (talk) 15:53, 5 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 6 November 2022
Please add new survey published by ABP Cvoter yesterday along with old one. 105.245.104.203 (talk) 06:16, 6 November 2022 (UTC)


 * Added. Ok123l (talk) 08:23, 6 November 2022 (UTC)

Election issues
Above references can help in expanding issues section.-Nizil (talk) 06:36, 8 November 2022 (UTC)
 * 
 * 
 * 
 * 


 * @Nizil Shah. Based on these refs, I think we can add Morbi bridge accident and Bilkis Bano case. Maybe expand agriculture as well. Dhruv edits (talk) 18:48, 8 November 2022 (UTC)

CPI(ML) Liberation
CPI(ML) Liberation will field 5 candidates in Gujarat election (according to CPI(ML)L General Secretary Dipankar Bhattacharya). Please add it in others section. XYZ 250706 (talk) 16:44, 14 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @XYZ 250706 Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done: There are many political parties that contest elections. Information on every political party cannot be added, specially those that are not a major party for the election. Dhruv edits (talk) 17:55, 14 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 19 November 2022
Boss6040 (talk) 19:52, 19 November 2022 (UTC) https://telanganatoday.com/gujarat-polls-aaps-cm-candidate-isudan-gadhvi-to-contest-from-khambhalia-seat Add ishudan gadhavi photo

Add Ishudan gadhavi photo Boss6040 (talk) 19:53, 19 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Red information icon with gradient background.svg Not done for now: Please provide a photo with an acceptable license. We can't use copyrighted photographs taken from other websites. ScottishFinnishRadish (talk) 19:57, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

Boss6040 (talk) 07:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

Add The photo on isudan gadhavi Boss6040 (talk) 07:55, 20 November 2022 (UTC)

CPIM Candidates
CPIM has declared 9 candidates for Gujarat 2022 election. Please include it in parties and alliance section. (https://www.facebook.com/photo/?fbid=691295512362248&set=a.544818833676584) CPIM is not a main contender in this election but if number of candidates of BTP and AIMIM is given, then the number of candidates of CPIM (a national party) should also be given.XYZ 250706 (talk) 10:18, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * added Ok123l (talk) 12:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 20 November 2022
Communist Party of India (Marxist) also contesting on 9 Seats in Gujarat assembly elections. Kindly add that in the Wikipedia. PrasenjiSpeaks (talk) 10:39, 20 November 2022 (UTC)


 * added Ok123l (talk) 12:15, 21 November 2022 (UTC)

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 22 November 2022
In the Opinion Poll Section, please add Times Now - ETG Research Opinion Poll WikiNav 14:30, 22 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Red question icon with gradient background.svg Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. – Jonesey95 (talk) 22:17, 22 November 2022 (UTC)


 * In the Opinion Polls Section requesting the editors to add Opinion Polls Published by Times Now - ETG Research.
 * Times Now is one of Leading Media House and the opinion poll published by the Media House is currently missing in the section. I am attaching the relevant links of the Opinion Poll Coverage for your reference.
 * Link 1
 * Link 2
 * The Results of the Opinion Poll are:
 * Polling firm/Commissioner : Times Now - ETG Research
 * Date published: Nov 3, 2022
 * BJP: 125-130, 45% Vote Share
 * INC: 29-33, 21% Vote Share
 * AAP: 20-24, 29% Vote Share
 * Others: 1-3, 5% Vote Share WikiNav 07:56, 23 November 2022 (UTC) — Preceding unsigned comment added by CovidBubble (talk • contribs)

BJP Manifesto
===Manifesto   ===


 * $1 trillion Economy and FDI: We will make Gujarat a $1 trillion economy by maintaining its pole position in manufacturing, focusing on services and investing in human and institutional capacity-building for new-age industries. We will attract ₹5 lakh crore foreign investment and make Gujarat the Defence and Aviation Manufacturing Hub of India.


 * Urban Infrastructure Beautification: We will spend ₹25,000 crore under the Gujarat Urban Development Mission to transform the urban landscape with a focus on decongesting the existing cities (Satellite Townships) and increasing ease of living (Riverfront, Recreational Parks, Urban Forests, Traffic Management Systems) for citizens.


 * Olympics in Gujarat: We will launch Gujarat Olympics Mission and create world-class sports infrastructure with an aim to host the Olympic Games in 2036.


 * Agri Infra: We will invest ₹10,000 crore under Gujarat Krishi Infrastructure Kosh to develop a holistic system of Khedut Mandis, modern APMCs, sorting and grading units, cold chains, warehouses, primary processing centres, etc.


 * Irrigration Project: We will invest ₹25,000 crore to expand the existing irrigation network through projects such as Sujalam Sufalam, SAUNI, lift irrigation projects, micro irrigation, drip irrigation and other systems across Gujarat.


 * Gaushala: We will ensure holistic care for livestock by strengthening Gaushalas (additional budget of ₹500 crore), setting up 1,000 additional Mobile Veterinary Units and ensuring complete vaccination and insurance.


 * Sea Food Park, corridor and Fishing Infra:We will set up 2 Sea Food Parks (one each in South Gujarat and Saurashtra), build India’s first Blue Economy Industrial Corridor and strengthen fishing related infrastructure (jetties, cold supply chain and mechanisation of boats).


 * Healthcare: We will double the annual cap under the Pradhan Mantri Jan Arogya Yojana (Ayushman Bharat) from ₹5 lakh to ₹10 lakh per family and ensure free-of-cost medical treatment.


 * Diagnostic Scheme: We will launch the Mukhyamantri Free Diagnostic Scheme with a corpus of ₹110 crore to provide free-of-cost diagnostic services in all government health institutions and empanelled laboratories for EWS households.


 * Medical Colleges: We will create a ₹10,000 crore Maharaja Shri Bhagvatsinhji Swasthya Kosh to set up 3 Civil Medicities, 2 AIIMS-grade institutions, and upgrade infrastructure at existing healthcare facilities (Hospitals, CHCs and PHCs).


 * Building School of Excellence: We will convert 20,000 government schools into Schools of Excellence with a budget of ₹10,000 crore in the next 5 years.


 * Upgrading School Infra: We will launch Keshavram Kashiram Shastri Higher Education Transformation Fund with a budget of ₹1,000 crore, to construct new government colleges and revamp the existing colleges and universities with state-of-the-art facilities.


 * 20 lakh Jobs: We will provide 20 lakh employment opportunities to the youth of Gujarat in the next 5 years.


 * 4 Industrial College: We will establish 4 Gujarat Institute of Technology (GIT) on the lines of IITs as Centres of Excellence in the areas of Green Energy, Semiconductors, FinTech, and Aerospace.


 * PM Awas Yojna-House Allocation: We will ensure that every citizen in Gujarat has a pucca house and ensure 100% implementation of the Pradhan Mantri Awas Yojana.


 * Family Card Yojana: We will launch a Family Card Yojana, which will enable every family to avail benefits of all State Government-run welfare schemes.


 * Ration: We will provide 1 litre of edible oil four times a year and 1 kg subsidised chana per month at subsidised rates through the PDS system.


 * Ration Home Delivery: We will initiate mobile delivery of ration across all 56 Tribal Sub Plan Talukas.


 * Tribals Development: We will spend ₹1 lakh crore under the Vanbandhu Kalyan Yojana 2.0 for the all-round socio-economic development of tribals.


 * Religious Development: We will construct a Birsa Munda Adi Jati Samriddhi Corridor between Ambaji and Umergram to spur growth by connecting every tribal district’s headquarters with a 4-6 lane state highway, and by constructing a tribal cultural circuit to connect Pal Dadhvaav and the Statue of Unity to Shabari Dham.


 * Building Medical Colleges: We will ensure state-of-the-art healthcare facilities in tribal areas by setting up 8 medical colleges, and 10 nursing/para-medical colleges.


 * Set-up 8 GIDCs: We will set up 8 GIDCs in the tribal belt to generate employment opportunities for tribal youth.


 * Edication: We will set up 25 Birsa Munda Gyan Shakti Residential Schools to provide the best residential schooling facilities to 75,000 meritorious students from the tribal community.


 * Free Education: We will provide free-of-cost, quality education to all female students from KG to PG.


 * Free E-scooters to Female: We will start Sharda Mehta Yojana to provide free two-wheelers (electric scooters) to meritorious college-going female students from financially weak households.


 * Free Bus to Female: We will provide free bus travel to female senior citizens in the state.


 * 1 lakh Government Jobs: We will create more than 1 lakh government jobs for women in the next 5 years.


 * Shramik Credit Cards: We will introduce Shramik Credit Cards for labourers to provide them with collateral-free loans up to ₹2 lakh.


 * ₹50000 to ranker: We will provide a one-time incentive grant of ₹50,000 for OBC/ST/SC/EWS students who get into a NIRF top-ranking institution in India or a top-ranking world institution for higher education.


 * Uniform Civil Code: We will ensure the complete implementation of the Gujarat Uniform Civil Code Committee’s recommendation.


 * Anti-Radicalisation Cell: We will create an Anti-Radicalisation Cell to identify and eliminate potential threats, and sleeper cells of the terrorist organisations and anti-India forces.


 * Pubilc-Privat Damage Recovery Act: We will enact the Gujarat Recovery of Damages of Public and Private Properties Act to recover damages done to public and private properties by anti-social elements during riots, violent protests, unrest, etc.


 * Police Modernization: We will spend over ₹1,000 crore on Police Force modernisation to strengthen the physical infrastructure, purchasing best-in-class weapons and equipment, and building India’s most robust IT infrastructure.


 * Highways: We will develop the first-of-its-kind Parikrama Path of 3,000 km encircling the whole state with 4-6 lane roads/ highways by constructing a South Eastern Peripheral Highway and North Western Peripheral Highway.


 * Corridors: We will develop Gujarat Link Corridors by completing the missing links and augmenting the existing highways through the East-West Corridor connecting Dahod with Porbandar and North-South Corridor connecting Palanpur to Valsad.


 * Exressway: We will develop a Saurashtra Express Highway Grid to provide seamless connectivity between important economic hubs and national highways.


 * Metro: We will ensure time-bound completion of Gandhinagar and Surat Metro, and kick-start work on Saurashtra (Rajkot) and Central Gujarat’s (Vadodara) first metro rail service.


 * Dharmic Infrastructure: We will build a Devbhumi Dwarka Corridor to establish it as western India’s biggest spiritual centre, comprising of the "World’s tallest Shree Krishna statue", a 3D immersive Bhagwat Gita experience zone and a viewing gallery for the lost city of Dwarka.


 * Renovate Temples: We will invest ₹1,000 crore to renovate, expand and promote temples, following the successful transformation model of Somnath, Ambaji and Pavagadh.


 * Cultural: We will invest ₹2,500 crore to promote Gujarat’s culture at the national and international levels by building museums, centres for performing arts, Sardar Patel Bhawan, etc.

,

Added Done. Mahesh Chhanga 78 (talk) 05:51, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 10:06, 27 November 2022 (UTC)
 * Thakur in Feb 22 (1).jpg

Extended-confirmed-protected edit request on 28 November 2022
Add INC's CM candidate's photo in Infobox. Notdost (talk) 13:29, 28 November 2022 (UTC)
 * @Notdost ✅ by Chennai Super Kings Lover. Dhruv edits (talk) 22:08, 28 November 2022 (UTC)

'Results by constituency' table
@Rohitsetthachok Please see discussion at Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election and Talk:2022 Himachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly election. The table for 'Results by constituency ' should be based on the new format, just like the candidates table here. The older tabular format doesn't provide proper sorting function, hence the change was needed. Dhruv edits (talk) 03:26, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

Election Result by constituency tabel Format
@Rohitsetthachok ,@User:Dhruv edits,@User:XYZ 250706 in the table "Resuls By Constituency" Party name with color is easy to readable and party name with background color looks messy.In the past election pages Party name with color is used for result table. I thought it should be applied. Mahesh Chhanga 78 (talk) 10:33, 8 December 2022 (UTC)