Talk:2022 North Ayrshire Council election/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Asheiou (talk · contribs) 20:25, 12 May 2023 (UTC)

GA review (see here for what the criteria are, and here for what they are not) On initial inspection, there are no glaring issues. The article seems a decent length and like it covers the relevant points. (Criteria marked are unassessed)
 * 1) It is reasonably well written.
 * a. (prose, spelling, and grammar):
 * No issues here. I added a couple of superficial subjective commas but it's all fine.
 * b. (MoS for lead, layout, word choice, fiction, and lists):
 * No issues, MoS followed without any major issues.
 * 1) It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a. (reference section):
 * No issues.
 * b. (citations to reliable sources):
 * Citations are all from established local news outlets or the local council.
 * c. (OR):
 * No original research as far as I can see.
 * d. (copyvio and plagiarism):
 * I can't find any copyvio or plagiarism.
 * 1) It is broad in its coverage.
 * a. (major aspects):
 * The context around the election is broad but not overly so.
 * b. (focused):
 * Per-ward election results are set out in a very easy-to-read way.
 * 1) It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * This serves as an accurate account of events.
 * 1) It is stable.
 * No edit wars, etc.:
 * One of the most stable edit histories I've ever seen - all edits are constructive and there are no edit wars.
 * 1) It is illustrated by images and other media, where possible and appropriate.
 * a. (images are tagged and non-free content have non-free use rationales):
 * No images.
 * b. (appropriate use with suitable captions):
 * N/A
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass/fail:
 * Everything looks good!