Talk:2022 in science

Here is a table of non-included items (some relevant to other articles or with non-inclusion rationales)

Created the talk-page
Created the talk-page for the 2022 in science page - Enjoy! :) Drbogdan (talk) 13:52, 2 January 2020 (UTC)

Shackleton
I think the discovery of the Endurance belongs in archeology, not science? Reesorville (talk) 20:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)


 * Specifically, the discovery is part of maritime archaeology, The website for the expedition "Endurance22" mentions it here. But archaeology is a science. So it should be listed here. Richard-of-Earth (talk) 03:54, 26 March 2022 (UTC)
 * I mean there is a 2022 in archaeology page on wikipedia; it would belong there rather than here? Archeology is a scientific study of past remains, but I would argue that this page should be studies of things other than stuff created by human beings. If it was tools by early hominids, I feel that would be OK, but this is something very much in the modern-era. Otherwise why not include new historical discoveries, new theories in sociology, economics or other fields of knowledge? Reesorville (talk) 19:06, 29 March 2022 (UTC)
 * It is already on that page as well. I think it is fine on this page. If the page seemed bloated or too long I would think about being choosy, but it is not, so it is fine with me. Richard-of-Earth (talk)

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 09:51, 25 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Starliner approaches ISS.jpg

A Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion
The following Wikimedia Commons file used on this page or its Wikidata item has been nominated for speedy deletion: You can see the reason for deletion at the file description page linked above. —Community Tech bot (talk) 14:36, 31 May 2022 (UTC)
 * Frontiersupercomputer2022.jpg

List inclusion criteria
Hi Folks, the article series (year) in science which has zero inclusion criteria is very similar to the series (year) in climate change which has (in my view) poorly defined criteria. Since these are articles series, the WP:TPG urges us to avoid WP:MULTI discussions and instead have one place to talk about such things. If folks working on this series want to hear the details about LISTCRIT as applied to these series, you're welcome to check out the thread I started at


 * Talk:History_of_climate_change_science

I don't care what LISTCRIT are used for these articles, so I don't plan to help develop them. I just thing if we're going to collect these things in these lists, then there should be articulated and actionable inclusion standards. Carry on NewsAndEventsGuy (talk) 10:27, 21 June 2022 (UTC)

Thanks, but things are fine as they are. Don't change anything please. This article is managed perfectly by the various regular contributors here, and we don't need a rigid set of rules. "If it ain't broke, don't fix it." Wjfox2005 (talk) 15:01, 23 June 2022 (UTC)


 * I mostly agree with what Wjfox2005 said but also support developing some form of criteria (these wouldn't necessarily be a rigid set of rules – for example exceptions could be made and later become part of additional criteria). Here I have developed and proposed a list of, partly broad, inclusion criteria: Talk:2020_in_science.
 * I suggest developing this set of criteria further. A userspace-list that I 'll create created may help to better understand and formalize these. There are were some additions/changes to it that I haven't yet added there (participation in the discussion there was low anyway). I have linked the proposed criteria at Talk:2023 in science and am or aim to be making additions to this list based on this mostly formalized set of criteria. Other than that (additions or) removals of specific items can always be discussed (and/or tagged within the article) on a case-by-case basis if needed. --Prototyperspective (talk) 16:06, 16 August 2022 (UTC)

Big changes and developments
Astronomers reported discovery ofHD1 110.224.240.168 (talk) 13:35, 18 October 2022 (UTC)