Talk:2023 New Zealand general election

Revert
User:Onel5969, regarding your revert with the edit summary "Restore redirect - dupe article", which existing article is this one duplicating?  Schwede 66  03:36, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * , the target of the redirect, 2020 New Zealand general election.  Onel 5969  TT me 12:49, 8 December 2020 (UTC)


 * But that was the last election, not the next.  Nixinova   T   C   19:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

WP:CRYSTAL
Most of the detail in this page is pure speculation - there is a whole info box of party leaders and details about them. None of this is known nor referencable this far out. The page should probably be deleted. Or severerly edited to current facts only. Andrewgprout (talk) 07:34, 8 December 2020 (UTC)


 * [Leave comments at the deletion nom page instead of here.]  Nixinova   T   C   19:38, 8 December 2020 (UTC)

Election date
Can someone verify my calculations for getting 13 Jan 2024 as the last possible date this election could be held? The math seems right but the date just feels wrong.  Nixinova  <b style="border:1px solid #006eff"> T </b> <b style="border:1px solid #00a1ff"> C </b>  02:22, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Hi, was just coming to the talk page to raise something about this and saw your question. I was just skimming through the Electoral Commission's report on the last election and referendums, available at https://www.parliament.nz/resource/en-NZ/PAP_111347/5099a2c06fa9cc7049a6ffa217022ec636f5b2b9, and found that they give a last possible date for the next election of 23 December 2023. (It's on page 63 of the pdf, or page 61 by the report's own numbering). This caught my eye, as I remembered this page showing your calculated date in 2024. The report doesn't go into the calculations behind the December date, so the point of divergence between them and you isn't clear.
 * One would hope that the Electoral Commission know what they're talking about, but they have made surprising errors before, and it's possible that this sentence of the report was done quickly and carelessly, as it deals with a very hypothetical situation (an election hasn't been held on the last possible date for several decades, and in any case it would be extremely unlikely that one would be scheduled just before Christmas or in January.) I'm no expert, but I can't see an obvious error in your calculations. It would be good if others could check this. MW691 (talk) 06:33, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * It doesn't match the writ timeline at all but the only ways I could get 23 Dec 2023 are: 1) adding 28 days to 20 November 2023; 2) adding 60 days after 17 Oct; or (3) adding 20 days (the figure mentioned in #2) after 27 Nov 2023 – rounding up to the nearest Saturday for each (I think it's meant to round down though). Weird. I'd like to see the Commission's methodology. <b style="border:1px solid #0800aa"> Nixinova </b> <b style="border:1px solid #006eff"> T </b> <b style="border:1px solid #00a1ff"> C </b>  08:35, 18 May 2021 (UTC)
 * Hello, picking this up again. While nosing around the more obscure corners of the Parliament website, I found a detailed Parliamentary Library research paper on the 2020 election and referendum results. It looks like it could be a useful source for a number of things, but what immediately struck me is that it confirms your calculations giving 13 January 2024 as the last possible date. I've therefore gone ahead and and cited it. MW691 (talk) 06:17, 3 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Thanks! That's a very good source, explicitly laying out exactly what we wanted. Glad my calculations were correct. <b style="border:1px solid #0800aa"> Nixinova </b> <b style="border:1px solid #006eff"> T </b> <b style="border:1px solid #00a1ff"> C </b>  06:19, 3 October 2021 (UTC)

Next vs 2023
The Elections in New Zealand page says "The Constitution Act 1986 requires new parliamentary elections every three years, unless a major crisis arises or the prime minister loses the ability to command a majority in parliament." The latter isn't possible and the former is more WP:CRYSTAL so I think the idea should be reconsidered in light of an MMP majority making the possible snap election not possible. <b style="border:1px solid #0800aa"> Nixinova </b> <b style="border:1px solid #006eff"> T </b> <b style="border:1px solid #00a1ff"> C </b>  21:03, 20 October 2021 (UTC)


 * I would like to see a reliable source make that conclusion. Onetwothreeip (talk) 03:52, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Make which conclusion? <b style="border:1px solid #0800aa"> Nixinova </b> <b style="border:1px solid #006eff"> T </b> <b style="border:1px solid #00a1ff"> C </b>  04:00, 21 October 2021 (UTC)
 * That an election can only occur before three years from the last one except for the government losing confidence. Onetwothreeip (talk) 06:53, 21 October 2021 (UTC)

Is it okay if I moved it to 2023 New Zealand general election because the Prime Minister said that election will be held November next year. Villian Factman (talk) 10:59, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
 * Where did she say this? --Pokelova (talk) 11:03, 11 December 2022 (UTC)

Happy new year everyone! I propose that we move the article to "2023 New Zealand general election". Obviously, a 2022 snap election didn't happen. It's theoretically possible that the election will be held in January 2024 but that is simply not realistic. Is there anything that should hold us back making such a page move?  Schwede 66  21:34, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Pretty much all of the media and politicians are making reference to a 2023 election, at this point we might as well. --Pokelova (talk) 21:44, 4 January 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks. There does not seem to be any concerns with "2023 election". Certainly, the news media have an expectation that the election won't be scheduled for early 2024. I've added a few quotes to the article that reflect those sentiments. With that, we are in a position where we can move the article to "2023" as discussed here. I shall do so.  Schwede 66  08:00, 9 January 2023 (UTC)

Populism
Is it appropriate to refer to the Opportunities Party as having a platform of populism? The Populism article describes it as frequently being associated with anti-establishment and anti-political, but although it clearly wants to change things it's never been my impression of TOP's policies that it wants to radically pull apart the political system. It seems to have been inserted by an anonymous edit on 25th July. For the other parties I'd happily apply it to NZ First, which seems to rely lots on the popularity and personality of its leader. I don't know enough about the New Conservative Party. --Izogi (talk) 01:42, 28 August 2023 (UTC)
 * It depends on what reliable sources say, though my own opinion is that TOP isn't populism. pcuser42 (talk) 03:28, 28 August 2023 (UTC)

Same day as Australian referendum
Is the coincidence of the NZ election being on the same day as the 2023 Australian Indigenous Voice referendum any more relevant here than in Australia (where it is not relevant)? Is it important to the Kiwis? I don't know - I'm an Australian, not a NZer. Mitch Ames (talk) 03:29, 7 September 2023 (UTC)


 * Our election date was set back in January (I think). Long before the referendum date got announced. I don't think that anyone is trying to coordinate anything; it's just a coincidence. It could possibly be covered under "See also", with a note to the timing.  Schwede 66  05:14, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * It may be relevant given that tens of thousands of Kiwis will be voting in two things on the same day. Also, it could be noteworthy given that the article I sourced mentions that it could impact the debate around Māori issues in New Zealand. I should also point out that National will be contesting Māori seats for the first time. QLDer in NSW (talk) 11:47, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Fine. But if it’s mentioned in the prose, it can’t also go into the "See also" section as per WP:NOTSEEALSO.  Schwede 66  17:10, 7 September 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay. QLDer in NSW (talk) 01:16, 8 September 2023 (UTC)

Party policies
Hi there, I have placed media coverage of party announcements and policies in the Campaigns section of the article. Was wondering whether it would be better to place these in the issues section of the article. They can then be organised thematically based on issues such as health, law and order, climate change, etc? There is a paragraph discussing Labour, Greens, National and ACT's immigration policies in the issues section but most of the campaign issues are in the campaigns section. Have looked at the 2017 New Zealand general election and the 2019 United Kingdom general election for comparisons. Let me know what you think. Andykatib (talk) 12:57, 2 October 2023 (UTC)

New Zealand First election manifesto
, you wrote: On 6 October, NZ First released its election manifesto, which revised its earlier promise to drop GST on basic foods in favour of a select committee of inquiry. Not quite; this is what happened:
 * NZF published its election manifesto immediately prior to last night's minor leaders' debate on TVNZ+.
 * When Peters got asked by Jack Tame whether he supported Labour's proposal to remove GST off fruit and veg, he said that he didn't.
 * Tame then had Peters on about not knowing what NZF had in its manifesto.
 * The party then quickly updated what was on its website to bring it in line with Peters had just stated on live TV.

That's written up in the Spinoff's Bulletin, its daily newsletter. That newsletter isn't online, but you can subscribe to it for free. The relevant passage reads:

GST was also the subject of perhaps the most interesting story to emerge from last night’s TVNZ minor leaders debate. Asked whether he supported removing GST from food, NZ First leader Winston Peters said he did not. Just one problem: the party’s own manifesto, published just moments before the debate commenced, said it would do exactly that. "We will take GST off basic foods including fresh food, vegetables, meat, dairy, and fish,” its policy page read – and you can’t get much clearer than that. Still, Peters insisted that NZ First would only consider removing GST from food, and the web page was quickly updated to reflect this new policy.

I hope that's useful.  Schwede 66  02:10, 6 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Thanks for pointing this out. Will revise that sentence and look for other sources on NZ First' manifesto. Andykatib (talk) 02:31, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I think that referencing the Bulletin should do the trick. It's from a reliable source. Its author is Anna Rawhiti-Connell.  Schwede 66  02:37, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, have started subscribing to the Spinoff. Haven't received that particular newsletter. Also not to sure how to cite emails. I also came across an article by Newsroom about NZ First's manifesto. That article stated that: The party had also wanted to remove GST off “basic foods including fresh food, vegetables, meat, dairy, and fish” but again as of Thursday night that had gone, and was replaced with a policy to set up a Select Committee inquiry to find out if that would be worth it, before making any changes. So, that would support the Spinoff newsletter's report that the NZ First manifesto had announced they would remove GST on basic foods but he later changed his position at the TVNZ Minor Party debate that same day. Would that be a fair way of describing what happened? Andykatib (talk) 04:17, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Yeah, that would do. I suppose what really happened is that Peters had a "senior moment" (he is 78, after all) and simply forgotten what it says in the election manifesto. It was quite a funny incident; I watched the minor leaders' debate last night. With regards to a reference, you can use this:  Schwede 66  04:41, 6 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks, will put it in later. I think Winston flip flopping on the issue of GST on foods exposes his mercurial nature. NZ First is basically his personal vehicle. Wonder what would happen to the party if God calls him home. Andykatib (talk) 23:02, 6 October 2023 (UTC)

Polling booths with limited operating hours
Call it original research, but I had a chat with somebody from the Electoral Commission about this issue. I was told that the limited operating hours are no different to how the 2017 general election was run. It WAS different in 2020 but that was a deliberate effort to provide lots more polling capacity so that voters could spread out, limiting the risk of COVID infections. If this is correct, it's surprising that there is such media attention on something that is the same as it was six years ago.  Schwede 66  05:40, 9 October 2023 (UTC)

What one is better?
Kiwiz1338 (talk) 05:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Option 2 is the format used for every New Zealand election article since MMP came in. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 05:26, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Excellent work. Either one works. Option 2 is cleaner as there’s less going on. But whichever we choose, we should comply with MOS:
 * sentence case
 * dmy dates
 * macrons to reflect common names
 * Any questions, please ask.  Schwede 66  05:40, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Okay I fixed up what I saw needed it. How is it? Kiwiz1338 (talk) 06:51, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * It seems that the situation has already been resolved, but as someone who "uses" Wikipedia rather than editing it, I find the first option far more informational and pleasing to the eye. Canada adopted a style of election maps created by Matthew. As a user, I enjoy that the map provides a wide range of information in one graphic. I understand that it's not the "template that has been used" but the template used by Matthew was implemented on the 2020 election and looks great. Please consider the value of the map outside of the "tradition." Cheers. SununuFan2016 (talk) 14:44, 12 October 2023 (UTC)

Option 1:
 * "72 Electorates|49 List Seats|61 for Majority|October 14th, 2023" needs to be "72 electorates | 49 list seats | 61 for majority | 14 October 2023"
 * "ACT Party candidate Neil Christensen died on October 9th resulting in the electorate vote for the October 14th general election in Port Waikato being cancelled, a by-election for the seat has been scheduled for November 25th, 2023" needs to be "ACT Party candidate Neil Christensen died on 9 October resulting in the electorate vote for the 14 October general election in Port Waikato being cancelled; a by-election for the seat has been scheduled for 25 November 2023"
 * "Due to be filled after November 25th by-election" needs to be "Due to be filled after 25 November by-election"
 * "Change in Party vote" needs to be "Change in party vote"
 * "Māori Electorates" needs to be "Māori electorates"
 * "List Seats" needs to be "List seats"
 * "Party List" (4 times) needs to be "Party list"
 * "Aukland" is spelled "Auckland" (and I don't know why you have that map twice)

Same with option 2.  Schwede 66  07:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Well, I never made the option 1 map. It had already been put on the article so I feel it respectable to at least get some advice and compare what is a better option. I have made the option 2 map, which I believe should be on the article. I should have specified that I was only fixing the map I made. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 08:25, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I see. I didn't realise that. In that case, I shall ping for option 1 fixes. Regarding option 2, it should use sentence case for the captions at the top, i.e. "General electorates", "Māori electorates", and "List seats".  Schwede  66  09:31, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'll get that done, thank you Kiwiz1338 (talk) 09:38, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * If I am being honest I find this entire situation really a bit of a cheap shot, I'm a native english speaker from Ireland who spent a good 2 hours crafting this map only now for it to be inspected like a DNA samply under a microscope because I format some words or phrases wrong? Frankly I'm not sure whether I should feel more insulted by the nitpicks about grammar or the fact that Kiwiz1338 (who "thanked" me for uploading my map) is now all of a sudden insistent that the map he created be used... Matthew McMullin (talk) 09:48, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I appreciate the efforts you have taken and that is the reason why I thanked you for it, I do, but your results map is very very complex. Many aspects of your map are going to be thoroughly represented in the results section of the article, such as the House of Representatives and change in party vote. Also, this is not a map I have made, it is a template that has been used for the previous nine New Zealand general election articles. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 10:12, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * it IS a map you made, YOU are the uploader of it and as such YOU under the wikipedia upload terms you signed YOURSELF as the author of it. again there is no set "template" for any election anywhere on wikipedia. maps change as thoughts on what should be included change. and like I said previously it seems like an incredibly cheap shot and even disrespectful for you to suddenly upload your own map AFTER the one I uploaded was published (because I am doubtful you by coincidence began making yours before you saw mine) Matthew McMullin (talk) 10:19, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I respect your opinion, Matthew. By template, I mean very simular result maps have been used historically NZ election wise, and I don't think it should be changed unless somthing is wrong with it. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 10:37, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Given you are that adament I will concede. I would however like the 2 hours I wasted creating my map back. Matthew McMullin (talk) 10:41, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I appreciate your willingness to concede, and I understand that you might feel frustrated about the time you spent creating your map. I apologize for any inconvenience this may have caused you. While I can't directly refund the two hours, I'd be happy to work together to ensure that any future collaboration or projects go more smoothly and efficiently. Please feel free to reach out if you have any ideas or suggestions for improving our process. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 10:47, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * a word of advice from me to you, less of the condescending sarcasm would go a long way. Matthew McMullin (talk) 10:59, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I feel very flabbergasted you have said that, I never once had sarcasm in mind. Lets end this. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 11:06, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Matthew, are you going to address the list of issues? In its current state, we cannot use your chart.  Schwede 66  18:12, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * my chart is perfectly acceptable, I fixed the grammatical error on Auckland which was the only concern, formatting of dates is not a valid reasoning for not using a chart as the dates are still perfectly readable to any individual with an average grasp of the english language. local dialectic quirks have never been used as justification for a map not being displayed Matthew McMullin (talk) 19:17, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm not a native English speaker but I think that a map of a New Zealand election should try to follow Kiwi "dialectic quirks" as much as possible, just like a US map should follow American English conventions. Tidjani Saleh (talk) 03:43, 15 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Option 2 is clearly preferable IMO. Option 1 is far too overcomplicated and contains unnecessary detail. Cheers, Number   5  7  23:40, 13 October 2023 (UTC)
 * @Number 57 Obviously I'll be biased towards this as I made the option 2 map, but it is definitely more easy on the eye. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 00:24, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I find Option 2 much easier to read at the size included in the article, and at my normal browser window width.- gadfium 01:26, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * how exactly have you came to that conclusion? the size of both maps is the exact same so it would be impossible for one to be "much easier" to read due to the size of it. Matthew McMullin (talk) 01:30, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Option 1 uses much smaller text and white text on coloured backgrounds.- gadfium 01:53, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * white coloured text is the standard on darker background, it would for instance be incredibly ill-minded to use black text on the black box of new zealand first or the dark blue box of national. Matthew McMullin (talk) 02:03, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I also prefer option 2. It is less cluttered and easier to read. Kiwichris (talk) 01:51, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'd like to mention the storage size difference as well. 29.87 MB V. 891 KB. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 02:59, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * storage size when we are talking about merely MB is not relevant, my map is well within wikipedia's upload limit and no modern computer is unable to download a measly 30MB Matthew McMullin (talk) 03:02, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * I'm happy with option 2, but it seems to incorrectly have CHCH Central as a National win? Turnagra (talk) 20:25, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * to LAB. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 23:34, 14 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Option 2 is very good but it seems to incorrectly omit Debbie Ngawera-Packer and as co leader of Te Pāti Māori and list Rawiri Waititi as the only leader Ethan Maxwell-Garner (talk) 10:21, 10 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh. Good point.  Schwede 66  18:37, 10 November 2023 (UTC)

2023 map with labels?
Hi there, sorry to have to ask this, but not sure how to create the images myself. I wanted to see if someone with the skills could please create a map that labels the electorates? There is such images for every NZ MMP election from 1996-2017, under electorate results (e.g. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:New_Zealand_electorates,_2017.svg or https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/File:New_Zealand_electorates,_2014.svg ). But the beautiful images for 2023 and 2020 sadly lack the labels. I'm worried this could make it difficult for readers to match up which candidates ran where, geographically, in future - particularly after the next census / redraw by the Representation Commission. Would be very grateful if anyone could do something about this please? Sb101FV (talk) 12:58, 5 November 2023 (UTC) cc:, , /, , ,.


 * Hi. Yeah I'll do that this evening. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 01:55, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Maybe not finish it this evening but I'll start it. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 04:06, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Amazing, thank you, much appreciated! Sb101FV (talk) 09:47, 6 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Update. I have tried to make the map, but when I load openstreet maps on my computer it just keeps crashing and doesn't get any further than that. I'll keep trying but my computer isn't really up for it. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 11:17, 8 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks for trying! Fortunately, seems to having more luck with the 2020 version, so hopefully it'll be easy enough to adapt to 2023 when finished. Sb101FV (talk) 06:42, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Oh, you put a notice on both pages. I thought I just got a duplicate notification. In any case I think I'm done with the 2020 version now. Let me know if you want any improvements. If you're happy with it I can recolour it for 2023 in about 20 minutes work. —Korakys (talk) 08:14, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * 2023 map good? Kiwiz1338 (talk) 08:34, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Waiariki is missing the font colour and "Electorates" should be lower case. Thanks for your good work.  Schwede 66  16:46, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I think they're phenomenal! Imo they good enough to go in the 2023/23 Electorates results sections, but will defer as to whether and  want consistency first i.e. I love the winner-colored font labelling of the electorates on the 2023 map! And the party labels is nice in the top right (I also think the borders on the 2020 version help make it less busy but nbd). So will wait for confirmation rather than going ahead and adding them just yet. Sb101FV (talk) 23:15, 9 November 2023 (UTC)
 * I synchronised your choice of colours (except for a lighter shade of brown) with further tweaks I made and incorporated Schwede's notes. I just found out that we can no longer improve-in-place files that other users have made so I had to make a new file (wtf!).
 * commons:file:2020_New_Zealand_electorates.svg
 * commons:file:2023_New_Zealand_electorates_A.svg
 * Thanks ! That's perfect, I've stuck them in the 2023 election / Results and 2020 election / Results pages. Fwiw, I thought it looked better with |center|900px instead of |thumb|right|300px so people can actually read it without clicking/opening in a new tab. Sb101FV (talk) 22:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Just be clear, it's a bad idea to start the same conversation in multiple locations—there is a strong chance that important parts of the conversation will be missed by some, as happened here. Please don't do this in the future. —Korakys (talk) 01:59, 11 November 2023 (UTC)
 * In fairness, at the time I figured they were different image requests for different pages. But in retrospect I do see they functionally overlap enough that I could have just requested both in this talk. The benefit of hindsight ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ Thanks for the good work! Sb101FV (talk) 22:33, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Estimated population statistics
@ Lcmortensen. The total estimate eligible population is 3,871,418. We can't base the eligible population on the total enrolled population as unenrolled people can vote too, just have to do a special vote. In the rare scenario everyone who was enrolled voted and some people that were unenrolled voted too you would have to go above 100%. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 09:11, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * - The enrolment statistic of 3,503,810 is as of 30 September 2023, so does not include enrolments since then. An updated figure will be released when the election results come in. An increase of 321,838 voters between 2020 and 2023 is also unrealistic since New Zealand's population has only increased by 132,800 in the same period.Lcmortensen (mailbox) 09:21, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Well as of 30 September 2023, the Electoral Commission has said that 3,871,418 can vote whether enrolled or not, it doesn't stop someone enrolling in the voting place and casting a special vote. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 09:28, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Removing it was probably the best idea. We can just wait for an official eligible population stat. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 09:45, 12 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Also overseas New Zealanders are also apart of the eligible population, thus why it won't match the NZ population. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 02:55, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Notice to all who may ask about when the map shall be fully filled in
given that overseas ballots will likely hold a key balance in this election to determine whether or not National+ACT need New Zealand First or not it is likely that a full finalized results page by vote.nz will not be released for anywhere from 1-3 weeks. given this circumstance I will most likely not be able to 100% fill the map in but I shall do the bits I can. Matthew McMullin (talk) 12:45, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

****ing
Decensor "****ing" to "fucking" - it just looks stupid this way. https://www.stuff.co.nz/national/politics/300983505/tova-podcast-white-people-are-stupid-labour-minister-ing-useless--the-latest-candidate-in-twitterx-trouble 176.104.110.11 (talk) 14:39, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * Just because the newspaper censors itself doesn't mean Wikipedia should, and the rules have always been against censoring expletives, slurs and curses in quotes.--176.104.110.11 (talk) 14:42, 14 October 2023 (UTC)
 * This is a little different because it is censored in the original article. The relevant guideline is to preserve the wording in the source being quoted, even if we would otherwise not censor a word. I've added a "[sic]" as the guideline recommends to indicate this.  Anon 126   (notify me of responses! / talk / contribs) 15:13, 14 October 2023 (UTC)

Outstanding votes
Does someone know how many outstanding absentee or other early votes have yet to be counted? Total number of votes so far at only 2.2 million ballots cast, this number stood at 2.9 million at the last election. 2003:DA:C74D:BD00:4EB:6E76:D242:460D (talk) 23:58, 14 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Around 500,000 are still to be counted according to the media. The deadline for the official results is 20 days from the 14th, but it could be released earlier, like in 2017 when it was only 14 days. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 03:10, 15 October 2023 (UTC)
 * 567,000 the electoral commission has said. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 03:45, 15 October 2023 (UTC)

Seat diagram
Hello, just to know following a discussion here about the seat diagram. It's got its dots slightly cut on the bottom end since the recent modification, right? It's more visible on the left side. Or am I the one one to see it? Aréat (talk) 05:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC)


 * Kia ora, I think that's a problem with the way the page is displaying it not with the file itself. Jakoats02 (talk) 23:53, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Colour of ACT
Kia ora, was just wondering people's thoughts on ACT being magenta? Seems they've been mostly been using magenta as their primary colour this time around.

I had suggested using magenta on the map in the infobox as opposed to the orange it was changed to since concerns of clashing with te pati maori came up. Jakoats02 (talk) 23:52, 18 October 2023 (UTC)

Reactions section
Is this necessary? These are cited to tweets and congratulating other world leaders on their election is pretty much standard regardless of the victor. I feel like it would only be worth including if another country denounced the election result. ITBF (talk) 11:50, 26 October 2023 (UTC)

Update the results svg file?
Figured since the final results ended up with more seats than expected, it'd be a good idea to either update the current file to reflect the latest results or supersede the file with one that matches the current results, and since it wouldn't let me upload an updated version of the current file, I decided to upload an updated version under a different name. I'm not 100% sure if the copyright matches up, so if someone were willing to check that for me, I'd greatly appreciate that, as I'm fairly new to wikimedia/pedia editing. Here's the link to the file I made as a candidate to replace the current one though: https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:2023_NZ_House_of_Representatives.svg GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 05:37, 3 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hey, looks awesome. Once the Port Waikato by-election is done we will have to add another seat to it (most likely a National seat) and change the total to 123. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 08:20, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Thanks! Yeah I'll be sure to make an updated version after the by-election. Hopefully whatever was stopping me from uploading a 122-seat version of the old file won't crop up again updating 122 seats to 123. GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 12:05, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Sweet. There shouldn't be any problem uploading a new version. But make sure you go onto the Wikimedia Commons page of the file, it won't work through the Wikipedia version. Make sure it's the same format (.svg) and that you give a description in the file changes box. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 12:30, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Will do. Cheers! GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 12:46, 5 November 2023 (UTC)
 * So I've updated the file now to match the results after Port Waikato, but now it doesn't exactly match with the results shown on this page. Should we update these results or would it be better if I split off the new file and left the 122-seat diagram on this page while putting the 123-seat diagram on pages where the most recent results are important? GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 23:40, 25 November 2023 (UTC)

Hipkins photo
@RileySpaghetti kia ora, I think the image currently used looks weird. I don't know what exactly, weird facial expression maybe. Photo i had changed it to I think is better - looks less weird. Though I'll agree it's lower resolution but i don't think its terrible resolution. TheLoyalOrder (talk) 05:56, 7 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Hiya mate, Id argue that the photo is a formal protrait taken in the context of the 2023 election campaign that is firmly centred on presenting Chris Hipikins' face. The EC photo was originally in landscape and he isnt looking at the camera, perhaps less useful at presenting Hipkins himself. Mabye the one at the nato summit "File:Fumio Kishida and Chris Hipkins at the sidelines of the 2023 NATO Summit (1) (cropped).jpg" would be better if the facial expression does bother you but mind you it is the one Labour saw fit to use during the campaign and a smimilar thing has been done with Helen Clark in the pages for '99,'02, and '05. RileySpaghetti (talk) 06:05, 7 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Ok I'll probably just leave it. I think the photo looked less weird irl on campaign billboards, can't put my finger on exactly what's weird about it to me. TheLoyalOrder (talk) 06:22, 7 November 2023 (UTC)

Speaking of weird photos, is there not a better/official photo for David Seymour that could be used in the infobox? The current one looks out of place, like it's a capture from a zoom call or something. 161.29.216.215 (talk) 02:06, 11 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I very much agree, I think it was used because its more recent than his other photos but it doesn't look good I agree. RileySpaghetti (talk) 23:41, 11 November 2023 (UTC)

Party vote figures different
The party vote figures do not match those at https://www.electionresults.govt.nz/electionresults_2023/. E.g. Nat now 1,085,851, Lab now 767,540, etc. I'm guessing this is because of recounts, but I'm not certain. Normally I would plunge forward, but just wanted to get a 2nd opinion. Nurg (talk) 02:12, 16 November 2023 (UTC)


 * Yeah, I'm with you here, imo, we should definitely update the results to match the .govt.nz website GlowstoneUnknown (talk) 20:49, 16 November 2023 (UTC)

Seymour pictures
My white background Seymour photo was classed as "artificial", but I open the article today to find a bright yellow background on him. That's actually funny. Kiwiz1338 (talk) 07:27, 23 November 2023 (UTC)

Coloured background of party leader pictures
Is artificially adding coloured backgrounds to the party leaders portraits necessary or helpful for legibility? I haven't seen this done on any other election wikibox and I'd like to know the reasoning behind it and a debate on whether it is necessary before it is done to every other wiki box in new zealand history. @TheLoyalOrder RileySpaghetti (talk) 01:59, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I hope that someone gets rid of the coloured backgrounds, they are needlessly artificial and also quite ugly. 2607:FB60:1011:2006:38FB:8501:7047:63A5 (talk) 02:17, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * Support removing them - they look ugly, they're not needed and they should go Totallynotarandomalt69 (talk) 03:50, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * I don’t see it as helpful, it’s a reference page and soon will be historical info. It’s not necessary for it to function as political advertising or marketing which is how the colours appear. The photo of Seymour is also very old and the clear-cutout of Peters’ hair looks like a low poly 3D model. If photos are necessary for the box, I would consider whether it’s a higher priority to have recent photos that represent those leaders at the point in time of the election before worrying about party branding details. Maetl Encoder (talk) 05:08, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
 * hi, i thought it looked better but if people disagree (seems the case) then revert them TheLoyalOrder (talk) 07:08, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Luxon Photo
The recently added photograph in the infobox of Christopher Luxon is not artifical. This is his 2023 candidate photo supplied directly by the National Party and it includes a blue background. It is similar to how the photo of Hipkins is his 2023 candidate photo which was supplied by the Labour Party and it includes a white background. The photographs of the two Green Party leaders are also their 2023 candidate photos which are supplied by the Green Party. All of these photos are also used on all of the MPs' respective Wikipedia articles.

See:
 * Wikipedia talk:WikiProject New Zealand/politics/2023 list candidate photos
 * c:Category:National Party candidates for 2023 New Zealand general election

If you remove the Luxon photo, then you might as well remove the Hipkins photo as they are both supplied by their respective parties. They both have their own backgrounds that have not been edited or modified. DDMS123 (talk) 22:04, 25 November 2023 (UTC)


 * i don’t think either should be used: they might be party-supplied but they *are* both artificial. feel like a preference for photos with live backgrounds should be established! 2607:FB60:1011:2006:19A0:A2E7:3E3:EBC5 (talk) 22:28, 26 November 2023 (UTC)

Disallowed votes
The detailed results table lists 59,043 disallowed votes. The source for the table has no mention of "disallowed votes" at all. Where does this number come from and how are disallowed votes different from informal votes? Peetel (talk) 01:59, 6 July 2024 (UTC)
 * I have added a reference for disallowed votes. Informal votes are spoilt votes, i.e. where the vote cannot be counted because the paper is blank, defaced, voter intention is unclear, etc. Disallowed votes are votes that aren't counted because the voter was disqualified or other technical reasons, e.g. the voter wasn't enrolled to vote, voted in the wrong eletorate, or they voted more than once. Lcmortensen (mailbox) 07:37, 6 July 2024 (UTC)