Talk:21 grams experiment/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Bluesphere (talk · contribs) 15:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

I'm going to review this article in a day or two. Blue sphere  15:54, 18 July 2017 (UTC)

Alright, I have thoroughly gone through the article and I must say that I find no issues that prevents it from becoming a Good Article—the prose is well-written, engaging, and places all facts in context; images are properly licensed; sources appear to be reliable and supported inline; and it's broad for the most part, covering most topics associated with the subject. When I ran the Earwig tool it detected about 40% copyvio, but I ran it again today and became 29.6% which is kind of odd. But examining carefully, there is not a single copyright violation throughout. As a whole you did a wonderful job improving an article about a controversial yet divisive subject. So I'm happy to say this article has passed, well done!

To conclude this review, I would recommend this article be featured on the main page via Did You Know, as certain facts here are solid and might boost its page views.


 * Thanks for your review . I've listed this at DYK as recommended. Also the copyvio percentage dropeed as I noticed it was too high after you started the review then trimmed it down a little bit. :) Ping me when your nomination is ready to be reviewed. Freikorp (talk) 13:16, 20 July 2017 (UTC)