Talk:24/7 Media/Archives/2012

Comments
Please provide information on the current status of the company Standard2211 (talk) 21:20, 20 November 2011 (UTC) I think i am pretty much done. However, in the last 3 years there appears not many public record events that can be used to expand the article.Standard2211 (talk) 03:41, 25 November 2011 (UTC)

Requested move

 * The following discussion is an archived discussion of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on the talk page. No further edits should be made to this section. 

The result of the move request was: not moved now. I created the redirect 24/7 Media (the generic term is 24/7 media, and isn't covered on Wikipedia), and it seems likely that it will become the common name, at which point this could be moved. -- JHunterJ (talk) 19:37, 5 May 2012 (UTC)

24/7 Real Media → 24/7 Media – 24/7 Real Media has recently rebranded to 24/7 Media and we'd like our Wikipedia page to reflect this. Our old website (www.247realmedia.com) shows this on the homepage, with a banner directing people to our new website (www.247media.com). Thank you. 247media (talk) 20:06, 27 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Comment "24/7 Media" is also a generic term for current day news media that's always on, like CNN or Fox News. 70.49.124.225 (talk) 04:32, 28 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Strong oppose. This is a change to the official name and irrelevant under article naming policy. There also appears to be an ambiguity problem with the proposed new name. Note also that proposer is blocked indefinitely (not by me) as a non-personal account, and that there are COI issues as well. Andrewa (talk) 13:52, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Oppose, per Andrewa. ENeville (talk) 14:30, 5 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of a requested move. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made in a new section on this talk page. No further edits should be made to this section.

Name issues
The company name appears to be the subject of some confusion. The article is well referenced in this regard but the text does not accurately reflect the information in the references, partly at least due to global edits that rendered parts of the text nonsensical, particularly in the History section.

I've made a start on fixing this but there is more to do. Andrewa (talk) 14:08, 5 May 2012 (UTC)