Talk:243 Ida/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria


 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. References to sources:
 * B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * I did a lot of searching around for more information, and there doesn't seem to be any. Would it be preferable to merge the discovery section into the exploration section? Reyk  YO!  04:30, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I have a few ideas for expansion. Your suggestion to merge the first two sections sounds fine. Alternately, we could expand it to include later observations, for example the spectroscopic survey that resulted in the S-type classification. This book has some more detail on Ida's naming. Also, we could mention that Palisa Regio was named after Ida's discoverer. Wronkiew (talk) 16:18, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I added more information about the spectroscopic measurements and Ida's naming. The section now contains four sentences. Wronkiew (talk) 16:13, 17 March 2009 (UTC)
 * B. Focused:
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * I'll remove the image for now and see if I can contact the uploader for proof of ownership. He claims to be Herbert Raab, the author of one of the papers we referenced. I like the image because it illustrates the type of meteorite being discussed in that section. Wronkiew (talk) 04:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OTRS received confirmation of ownership from the copyright holder, so I restored the image. Wronkiew (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:
 * B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:
 * I'll remove the image for now and see if I can contact the uploader for proof of ownership. He claims to be Herbert Raab, the author of one of the papers we referenced. I like the image because it illustrates the type of meteorite being discussed in that section. Wronkiew (talk) 04:02, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * OTRS received confirmation of ownership from the copyright holder, so I restored the image. Wronkiew (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * OTRS received confirmation of ownership from the copyright holder, so I restored the image. Wronkiew (talk) 06:02, 14 March 2009 (UTC)
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:

OhanaUnitedTalk page 02:53, 13 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Passed as GA. OhanaUnitedTalk page 01:05, 26 March 2009 (UTC)