Talk:280th Combat Communications Squadron

Dead link
During several automated bot runs the following external link was found to be unavailable. Please check if the link is in fact down and fix or remove it in that case!


 * http://w20.afpc.randolph.af.mil/awardsnet20/SearchAwards.aspx
 * In 1st Space Operations Squadron on 2011-05-25 06:54:08, 404 Not Found
 * In 1st Space Operations Squadron on 2011-06-10 04:23:55, 404 Not Found
 * In 269th Combat Communications Squadron on 2011-06-19 05:45:02, 404 Not Found

--JeffGBot (talk) 05:53, 19 June 2011 (UTC)

280th SOCS redesignation
Is there any reference to cite this? The 187th Fighter Wing still refers to it as the 280th Combat Comms Squadron on the Wing Factsheet. —  dain  omite   22:49, 23 February 2014 (UTC)

External links modified
Hello fellow Wikipedians,

I have just modified 3 external links on 280th Combat Communications Squadron. Please take a moment to review my edit. If you have any questions, or need the bot to ignore the links, or the page altogether, please visit this simple FaQ for additional information. I made the following changes:
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20080915054617/http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123111957 to http://www2.afsoc.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123111957
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110128184811/http://280thanniversary.com/ to http://www.280thanniversary.com/
 * Added tag to http://public.afca.af.mil/news/story.asp?id=123059342
 * Added archive https://web.archive.org/web/20110128184811/http://280thanniversary.com/ to http://www.280thanniversary.com/

When you have finished reviewing my changes, you may follow the instructions on the template below to fix any issues with the URLs.

Cheers.— InternetArchiveBot  (Report bug) 12:00, 22 June 2017 (UTC)

Merge?
This appears to be a direct copy of 280th Special Operations Communications Squadron, with the this page's title not even being reflected on this page. Is this from some move that wasn't cleaned up properly in the past or template that just hasn't been worked on since or what? Just trying to understand why we have two nearly identical looking pages and what to do about it. Elfabet (talk) 15:18, 1 February 2019 (UTC)