Talk:2C-G

Comments
I completely revamped the page, and added quite a bit of info, mostly from PiHKAL. I also de-stubbed the page because I feel that this is all the information there is on 2C-G (+ homologues). If more comes along it should of course be added, but I doubt any more information will surface. After all, Shulgin's lab is shut down, his group is likely disbanded and this drug will probably never be used on the street due to its extremely long duration :). --Silvem 09:21, 10 January 2006 (UTC)

All of the 2D pictures are wrong
All of the 2D structures do not agree with the 3D structures given in the same article, and this appears to be the case in each of the 2C family individual pages. It appears that the 3,6 analouges are shown, not 2,5. ERP — Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.149.241.170 (talk) 22:36, 30 November 2011 (UTC)
 * Nope. For one, that's how Shulgin drew it in his books. You are probably unfamiliar with the notation of aryl rings such as this; it is acceptable to have the positions flipped as you describe. Due to single-bond rotation they are the same compound, just displayed differently. flaming 02:10, 15 March 2012 (UTC)