Talk:2PM videography

Merging
videography and filmography are two different things, you can't just merge them. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lpmfx (talk • contribs) 15:21, 7 May 2012‎

DO NOT VANDALIZE
IF you do not know how Wikipedia works, then don't even think about editing. Both the videography an filmography articles are incredibly poor and filled with spam. Both articles should be brought together in a more concise form, that is written correctly, otherwise both articles WILL BE DELETED.--Dogwalkerz (talk) 12:08, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

2PM's Videography and Filmography
Videography and Filmography are two separate entities, I see no reason to merge. Videography refers to the compiling of an artist's music videos or video releases, and Filmography refers to a list of movies, shows, etc.. featuring the work of an artist. --Lpmfx (talk) 15:19, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Vote Against
I agree with User:Lpmfx above, these are both separate entities and there is no reason to merge them. If the pages are not well written, then make suggestions, that is what the rating system and talk pages are for. Deleting the pages would be a case of serious vandalism. -- Mikepellerin (talk) 18:44, 9 May 2012 (UTC)

Vote Against
I agree with User:Lpmfx above and User:Mikepellerin Callimaria (talk) 04:45, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Vote Against
I agree with User:Mikepellerin and User:Callimaria.--Lpmfx (talk) 13:20, 10 May 2012 (UTC)

Notice of changes
I am going to be editing this page and the filmography page in a week and may or may not merge the two onto this page. Doing so involves both articles be trimmed, for the videography this means I will be removing most or all the CFs. They are not referenced and for a list article that is absolutly needed, there MUST be a link to the videos. Also it's incomplete, (how did the fans forget the my color ads? They had a whole MV and song for it.) Anyways This needs to happen since the pages have been left like this for way too long. Peachywink (talk) 15:26, 29 March 2015 (UTC)
 * Added missing information and/or references is fine, but the removal of information will most likely be challenged.  Mikepellerin  talk 18:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * That's why I am letting people know now if they want these things to stay. They should find references proving notability or that these things even happened. I will do some of the research but I am not going to do it for everything especially for the things I believe aren't worthy of inclusion.Peachywink (talk) 19:45, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
 * and by worthy I mean meets the standards set forth by wikipedia for what is able to be included on these pages. I don't feel these ads meet that standard.Peachywink (talk) 15:09, 5 April 2015 (UTC)