Talk:3-Aminobenzamide

Untitled
Peer Review: Liz Vlahos

The picture looks good, but maybe try adding a title. Citations are properly imposed, you have credible and a sufficient amount of references, which is great. Also, the chem box is coming along and it seems you have gotten a lot of information about your chemical. The hazards section is great with the pictures and information. Properties are pretty good, except its kind of redundant with your chem box so maybe try adding some other information. Uses are a little difficult to follow for some, but the citations are placed correctly. I would try elaborating on the Safety section because there are plenty of hazards so you can expand on that (which you probably will). Try adding some more sections, maybe three, more to your page. So far, everything looks good; you guys even have citations in your chem box which is great. I think this will be great when you guys add some more stuff to it and finish it off! Lizvlahos (talk) 17:59, 28 October 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review: Allison Brown

Overall, this page looks really good, you are on your way to a Wikipedia page worth looking at. The chembox has a wealth of knowledge, with a good picture, many subcategories, and usable information. I like how you included the toxicity and biohazardous symbols. You have good sub sections of the article in place and well-cited information. You could continue to expand on the information presented in the Uses section and possibly add another section of information if the research exists. You can add as many chemical properties as you can to your chem box and keep finding good sources to do so to continue to make this a great page. Keep up the efforts! Anbrown4 (talk) 01:32, 2 November 2012 (UTC)

Peer Review: Ramin Amirsoltani

Overall, the layout of your page looks great. It looks really professional and believe for that matter. I like the organization of your chembox table you guys have on the right side of the page. Like Liz mentioned, you might be able to add a few more content related sections, for example, like the history of your chemical. The properties section looks sufficient, but I definitely think you can add more information to the USES and Safety section. Perhaps, you could add another section such as Production or the reactions that take place with the chemical. Great use of the citations, and with the number of references you guys have, I think you should be able to elaborate more. Overall, keep researching and you should be good to go. Good luck! Amirsol2 (talk) 01:35, 2 November 2012 (UTC)