Talk:3.14 (number)

Comments
Should this article be deleted and any references be cahnged to 'Pi'? Murray Langton 21:26, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * No, users looking for Pi would have typed that in the search box, or can find it by clicking the link in the first sentence. If they were specifically interesting in 3.14 they would have trouble finding it in the Pi page. Kappa 21:32, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect pages show up in search results, so the above argument doesn't hold. In fact, searching for "3.14", with or without this being a redirect, doesn't product any results whatsoever. In other words, this should be redirected. Fredrik | tc 22:35, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * This page hasn't had time to be indexed, and you haven't addressed my point about specific information about 3.14 being hard to find in Pi. Kappa 22:47, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * How can "information on 3.14" be hard to find in Pi? It is stated right in the lead section that 3.14 is how its decimal expansion begins! For the record, we don't have separate articles for Muammar Gaddafi, Moammar Qadaffi, Moammar Al Qadhafi, etc, despite the possibility that someone might search for those. Fredrik | tc 22:59, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * 3.14 is not Pi, unlike the Gaddafi examples. Someone typing in this number is likely interestested in how significant the difference is, and/or what makes a better approximation. Kappa 23:14, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * The difference is what the article on Pi is there to explain. If you think Pi doesn't do a good enough job, go improve it instead. Since this argument feels like a waste of effort, I'm putting this up on AFD for input from others. Fredrik | tc 23:37, 24 November 2005 (UTC)
 * Pi is there to talk about Pi in general, not 3.14 in particular. Kappa 23:42, 24 November 2005 (UTC)