Talk:31st/51st Battalion (Australia)/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Anotherclown (talk · contribs) 06:01, 21 April 2012 (UTC)

Progression

 * Version of the article when originally reviewed:
 * Version of the article when review was closed:

Technical review

 * Citations: The Citation Check tool reveals no errors (no action required).
 * Disambiguations: two dab links :
 * Ocean Island
 * Horn Island
 * Linkrot: external links check out (no action required).
 * Alt text: Images all have alt text (no action required).
 * Copyright violations: The Earwig Tool is currently not working, however spot checks using Google reveal no issues (no action required).

Criteria

 * It is reasonably well written.
 * a (prose): b (MoS):
 * The article is well written and I could not find any MOS issues.


 * It is factually accurate and verifiable.
 * a (references): b (citations to reliable sources):  c (OR):
 * All major points cited using WP:RS.
 * Consistent citation style used throughout.
 * No issues with OR.
 * Minor issue with ISBNs - one uses dashes, the others do not (action required).


 * It is broad in its coverage.
 * a (major aspects): b (focused):
 * All major points are covered without going into undue detail.


 * It follows the neutral point of view policy.
 * a (fair representation): b (all significant views):
 * No issues here.


 * It is stable.
 * No edit wars etc.:
 * All recent edits look constructive.
 * It contains images, where possible, to illustrate the topic.
 * a (tagged and captioned): b (Is illustrated with appropriate images):  c (non-free images have fair use rationales):  d public domain pictures appropriately demonstrate why they are public domain:
 * Images used are all in the public domain and seem appropriate for the article.


 * Overall:
 * a Pass/Fail:
 * Only a couple of minor issues (dabs and isbns) identified above to deal with / discuss, otherwise I am satisfied that this article meets all the GA criteria. Anotherclown (talk) 12:43, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Cheers, I think I've got them. Regards, AustralianRupert (talk) 13:04, 21 April 2012 (UTC)
 * Looks good. Passing now. Anotherclown (talk) 13:10, 21 April 2012 (UTC)