Talk:32X/GA1

GA Review
The edit link for this section can be used to add comments to the review.''

Reviewer: Numbermaniac (talk · contribs) 09:13, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

I have decided to take up the task of reviewing this article for GA status. -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 09:14, 9 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Fantastic. I look forward to hearing the results.   Red Phoenix  build the future...remember the past... 00:45, 10 July 2013 (UTC)

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria Decent article overall.
 * 1) Is it reasonably well written?
 * A. Prose quality:
 * B. MoS compliance for lead, layout, words to watch, fiction, and lists:
 * 1) Is it factually accurate and verifiable?
 * A. Has an appropriate reference section:
 * B. Citation to reliable sources where necessary:
 * C. No original research:
 * 1) Is it broad in its coverage?
 * A. Major aspects:
 * B. Focused:
 * A lot of information presented here, but not too much.
 * 1) Is it neutral?
 * Fair representation without bias:
 * As negative as this console seemed to be, both sides have been presented fairly in my opinion.
 * 1) Is it stable?
 * No edit wars, etc:
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This is a very good article overall.
 * 1) Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?
 * A. Images are tagged with their copyright status, and valid fair use rationales are provided for non-free content:
 * B. Images are provided if possible and are relevant to the topic, and have suitable captions:
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This is a very good article overall.
 * 1) Overall:
 * Pass or Fail:
 * This is a very good article overall.

Thanks. Yeah, the console was pretty poorly perceived and still is. Getting a neutral point was pretty tough because there's very few who see this console add-on in a positive light. I tend to think it's what really killed Sega as a console maker, even though they made the Saturn and Dreamcast later on. Red Phoenix build the future...remember the past... 00:24, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * This interview offers a tiny bit of positive, perhaps. I'm not sure if it's just trivial information or not.-- Sexy Kick  04:25, 11 July 2013 (UTC)
 * Even with all the negative attention, you've done brilliantly.
 * ✅! Sorry, I would have done this last night (about 14 hours ago), but the Internet cut out randomly. Well done! -- (T) Numbermaniac (C) 01:55, 11 July 2013 (UTC)